What Kind Of Evidence Should Be Presented In An Argument? Select Two Options.A. Relevant B. Sufficient C. Interesting D. Accomplished E. Biased

by ADMIN 150 views

What Kind of Evidence Should Be Presented in an Argument?

When it comes to presenting evidence in an argument, it's essential to understand what kind of evidence is most effective. In this article, we'll explore the different types of evidence and discuss which two options are the most suitable for presenting a strong argument.

Relevant Evidence: The Foundation of a Strong Argument

Relevant evidence is the most crucial type of evidence in an argument. It refers to information that is directly related to the topic or issue being discussed. Relevant evidence helps to establish a connection between the claim and the facts, making it easier for the audience to understand and accept the argument. For instance, if you're arguing that a new policy should be implemented to reduce traffic congestion, relevant evidence would include statistics on the current traffic situation, data on the effectiveness of similar policies in other cities, and expert opinions on the matter.

Sufficient Evidence: The Key to Convincing Your Audience

Sufficient evidence is another critical type of evidence in an argument. It refers to information that is enough to convince the audience of the validity of the claim. Sufficient evidence should be based on credible sources, such as academic research, expert opinions, or data from reputable organizations. For example, if you're arguing that a new product is better than an existing one, sufficient evidence would include comparisons of the product's features, customer reviews, and ratings from independent testing organizations.

Interesting Evidence: A Double-Edged Sword

Interesting evidence can be a double-edged sword in an argument. While it can capture the audience's attention and make the argument more engaging, it may not necessarily be relevant or sufficient to support the claim. Interesting evidence can include anecdotes, personal experiences, or unique perspectives, but it should be used judiciously to avoid distracting from the main argument. For instance, if you're arguing that a new policy should be implemented to reduce poverty, interesting evidence might include a personal story of someone who has benefited from a similar policy, but it should be used to illustrate a broader point rather than being the sole basis of the argument.

Accomplished Evidence: A Red Herring

Accomplished evidence is not a relevant type of evidence in an argument. It refers to information that is impressive or impressive-sounding, but not necessarily relevant to the topic or issue being discussed. Accomplished evidence can include jargon, technical terms, or complex concepts that are meant to sound impressive but may not add any value to the argument. For example, if you're arguing that a new policy should be implemented to reduce traffic congestion, accomplished evidence might include a lengthy explanation of the policy's theoretical underpinnings, but it may not provide any concrete evidence or solutions to the problem.

Biased Evidence: A Threat to Credibility

Biased evidence is a type of evidence that is influenced by personal opinions, emotions, or agendas. Biased evidence can include information that is selectively presented, cherry-picked, or distorted to support a particular point of view. Biased evidence can undermine the credibility of the argument and make it less convincing to the audience. For instance, if you're arguing that a new policy should be implemented to reduce poverty, biased evidence might include statistics that are selectively presented to support a particular point of view, but ignore contradictory evidence or alternative perspectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when it comes to presenting evidence in an argument, relevant and sufficient evidence are the most crucial types of evidence. Relevant evidence helps to establish a connection between the claim and the facts, while sufficient evidence provides enough information to convince the audience of the validity of the claim. Interesting evidence can be used to capture the audience's attention, but it should be used judiciously to avoid distracting from the main argument. Accomplished evidence is not a relevant type of evidence, and biased evidence can undermine the credibility of the argument. By understanding the different types of evidence and using them effectively, you can present a strong and convincing argument that resonates with your audience.

Recommendations for Effective Argumentation

To present a strong argument, consider the following recommendations:

  • Use relevant evidence: Ensure that the evidence you present is directly related to the topic or issue being discussed.
  • Use sufficient evidence: Provide enough information to convince the audience of the validity of the claim.
  • Use interesting evidence judiciously: Use anecdotes, personal experiences, or unique perspectives to illustrate a broader point, but avoid distracting from the main argument.
  • Avoid accomplished evidence: Refrain from using jargon, technical terms, or complex concepts that may not add any value to the argument.
  • Avoid biased evidence: Ensure that the evidence you present is objective and unbiased, and avoid selectively presenting information to support a particular point of view.

By following these recommendations, you can present a strong and convincing argument that resonates with your audience.
Frequently Asked Questions: What Kind of Evidence Should Be Presented in an Argument?

In this article, we'll address some of the most common questions related to presenting evidence in an argument.

Q: What is the most important type of evidence in an argument?

A: Relevant evidence is the most crucial type of evidence in an argument. It refers to information that is directly related to the topic or issue being discussed. Relevant evidence helps to establish a connection between the claim and the facts, making it easier for the audience to understand and accept the argument.

Q: How can I ensure that my evidence is sufficient?

A: To ensure that your evidence is sufficient, you should provide enough information to convince the audience of the validity of the claim. This can include credible sources, such as academic research, expert opinions, or data from reputable organizations. You should also consider the audience's level of knowledge and expertise when presenting evidence.

Q: Can I use interesting evidence to make my argument more engaging?

A: Yes, you can use interesting evidence to make your argument more engaging. Interesting evidence can include anecdotes, personal experiences, or unique perspectives. However, you should use it judiciously to avoid distracting from the main argument. Make sure that the interesting evidence you present is relevant and supports the claim.

Q: What is the difference between accomplished evidence and relevant evidence?

A: Accomplished evidence refers to information that is impressive or impressive-sounding, but not necessarily relevant to the topic or issue being discussed. Relevant evidence, on the other hand, is directly related to the topic or issue being discussed. Accomplished evidence can include jargon, technical terms, or complex concepts that may not add any value to the argument.

Q: How can I avoid presenting biased evidence?

A: To avoid presenting biased evidence, you should ensure that the evidence you present is objective and unbiased. This means avoiding selectively presenting information to support a particular point of view. You should also consider alternative perspectives and contradictory evidence when presenting your argument.

Q: Can I use evidence from social media to support my argument?

A: While social media can be a useful source of information, it's not always the most reliable source of evidence. Social media can be prone to misinformation, bias, and manipulation. If you're going to use social media as evidence, make sure to verify the information through other credible sources and consider the potential biases and limitations of the source.

Q: How can I present evidence in a clear and concise manner?

A: To present evidence in a clear and concise manner, you should use simple language and avoid using jargon or technical terms that may be unfamiliar to your audience. You should also use visual aids, such as charts, graphs, or images, to help illustrate the evidence and make it more engaging.

Q: What are some common mistakes to avoid when presenting evidence?

A: Some common mistakes to avoid when presenting evidence include:

  • Using irrelevant or insufficient evidence
  • Presenting biased or manipulated evidence
  • Using accomplished evidence that is not relevant to the topic
  • Failing to consider alternative perspectives or contradictory evidence
  • Using social media as the sole source of evidence

By avoiding these common mistakes and following the recommendations outlined in this article, you can present a strong and convincing argument that resonates with your audience.

Additional Resources

For more information on presenting evidence in an argument, consider the following resources:

  • Books: "The Art of Argument" by David Kelley, "The Logic of Argument" by John L. Mackie
  • Online Courses: "Argumentation and Debate" on Coursera, "Critical Thinking and Argumentation" on edX
  • Websites: The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), The Pew Research Center, The Brookings Institution

By following these resources and recommendations, you can improve your skills in presenting evidence in an argument and become a more effective communicator.