The Use Of Scientific Evidence In Investigation And Investigation As An Effort To Enforce Environmental Law In The North Sumatra Regional Police

Feb 27, 2025 by ADMIN 145 views

Introduction

The Indonesian National Police (Polri) plays a crucial role in enforcing environmental law, and investigation and investigation are essential components of this process. As a professional, modern, and reliable institution, the National Police is required to serve the community and uphold the law. In the case of environmental crime, the investigation process involves a series of stages, including investigation, prosecution, examination, and settlement of case files. Gathering information through field research (pulbaket) and making reports on the results of investigations by experts is crucial in this process.

The Importance of Scientific Evidence in Environmental Crime Cases

Scientific evidence plays a vital role in environmental crime cases, particularly in establishing a causal relationship between the crime and its consequences. This type of evidence is often difficult to prove using only facts or other evidence. Article 96 of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Management and Protection emphasizes the importance of legal evidence in environmental crime cases, which includes witnesses' testimonies, expert statements, letters, instructions, suspects, and other evidence. Scientific evidence is a critical component of this legal evidence, and its submission in environmental cases is a challenge.

Challenges in Submitting Scientific Evidence in Environmental Cases

One of the challenges faced in submitting scientific evidence in environmental cases is the confidentiality of companies suspected of committing environmental violations. When companies issue waste containing certain chemicals, it can be difficult to obtain evidence without compromising their confidentiality. Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) stipulates that a court decision must be based on two valid evidences. This highlights the importance of scientific evidence in environmental crime cases and the need for investigators to optimize its use.

Research Methodology

This research is a normative and descriptive analysis that uses secondary data taken from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. Data collection is carried out through literature studies, and data analysis is performed using qualitative analysis methods. The research aims to analyze the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation as an effort to enforce environmental law in the North Sumatra Regional Police.

Results and Recommendations

The results of this research show that researchers and investigators should improve recruitment, education, and training in Subdit IV/Tipidter Dit.Reskrimsus North Sumatra Regional Police. It is also highly recommended that the use of scientific evidence is optimized in every investigation to ensure effective environmental law enforcement. Furthermore, researchers and investigators are advised to routinely hold scientific discussions related to judges' assessments in the environmental field. Through these steps, the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field can be improved, and environmental law enforcement can run better and more fairly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation is crucial in enforcing environmental law in the North Sumatra Regional Police. The challenges faced in submitting scientific evidence in environmental cases highlight the need for investigators to optimize its use. By improving recruitment, education, and training, and by optimizing the use of scientific evidence, researchers and investigators can improve the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field, leading to better and more effective environmental law enforcement.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on the following areas:

Improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation: Researchers and investigators should explore ways to optimize the use of scientific evidence in environmental crime cases, including the development of new methods and techniques for collecting and analyzing evidence.
Enhancing recruitment, education, and training: The North Sumatra Regional Police should prioritize improving recruitment, education, and training for researchers and investigators to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively enforce environmental law.
Promoting scientific discussions: Researchers and investigators should regularly hold scientific discussions related to judges' assessments in the environmental field to improve the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field.

By addressing these areas, researchers and investigators can improve the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement and contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future.

Q: What is the role of scientific evidence in environmental crime cases?

A: Scientific evidence plays a vital role in environmental crime cases, particularly in establishing a causal relationship between the crime and its consequences. This type of evidence is often difficult to prove using only facts or other evidence.

Q: What are the challenges faced in submitting scientific evidence in environmental cases?

A: One of the challenges faced in submitting scientific evidence in environmental cases is the confidentiality of companies suspected of committing environmental violations. When companies issue waste containing certain chemicals, it can be difficult to obtain evidence without compromising their confidentiality.

Q: What is the importance of Article 96 of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Management and Protection?

A: Article 96 of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Management and Protection emphasizes the importance of legal evidence in environmental crime cases, which includes witnesses' testimonies, expert statements, letters, instructions, suspects, and other evidence. Scientific evidence is a critical component of this legal evidence.

Q: What is the significance of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP)?

A: Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) stipulates that a court decision must be based on two valid evidences. This highlights the importance of scientific evidence in environmental crime cases and the need for investigators to optimize its use.

Q: What are the recommendations for improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation?

A: The recommendations for improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation include:

Improving recruitment, education, and training: The North Sumatra Regional Police should prioritize improving recruitment, education, and training for researchers and investigators to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively enforce environmental law.
Optimizing the use of scientific evidence: Researchers and investigators should explore ways to optimize the use of scientific evidence in environmental crime cases, including the development of new methods and techniques for collecting and analyzing evidence.
Promoting scientific discussions: Researchers and investigators should regularly hold scientific discussions related to judges' assessments in the environmental field to improve the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field.

Q: What are the benefits of improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation?

A: The benefits of improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation include:

Improved quality of investigations and investigations: By optimizing the use of scientific evidence, researchers and investigators can improve the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field.
Better and more effective environmental law enforcement: By improving the use of scientific evidence, researchers and investigators can contribute to better and more effective environmental law enforcement.
Enhanced public trust: By improving the use of scientific evidence, researchers and investigators can enhance public trust in the North Sumatra Regional Police and the environmental law enforcement process.

Q: What are the future research directions for improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation?

A: Future research directions for improving the use of scientific evidence in investigation and investigation include:

Developing new methods and techniques for collecting and analyzing evidence: Researchers and investigators should explore ways to develop new methods and techniques for collecting and analyzing evidence in environmental crime cases.
Improving recruitment, education, and training: The North Sumatra Regional Police should prioritize improving recruitment, education, and training for researchers and investigators to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively enforce environmental law.
Promoting scientific discussions: Researchers and investigators should regularly hold scientific discussions related to judges' assessments in the environmental field to improve the quality of investigations and investigations in the environmental field.