The Role Of DPRK Recruitment On The Independence Of The Independent Commission For The Pidie Regency Election For The Period 2018-2023
The Role of DPRK Recruitment on the Independence of the Independent Commission for the Pidie Regency Election for the Period 2018-2023
Introduction
The process of recruiting members of the Independent Election Commission (KIP) of Pidie Regency for the 2018-2023 period was marked by controversy, as the dominant role of the Regency Representative Council (DPRK) in the selection process raised concerns about the independence and integrity of the election. This study aims to examine the political dynamics that occurred during the recruitment process and analyze its effect on the independence of KIP Pidie.
The Dynamics of Political Interests in the Recruitment of KIP Pidie
This study uses a qualitative approach, reviewing primary data from in-depth interviews with informants involved in the recruitment process, including representatives from political parties, independent teams, and the public. Secondary data was obtained from literature studies and related documents. The analysis was carried out using the theory of independence and the theory of political recruitment models of Rush and Althof (1997).
The results showed that the recruitment process of KIP Pidie 2018-2023 was marked by the dynamics of political interests that affected important stages in the selection process:
Agency Formation
The independent team appointed as a selection committee was considered less credible because it was formed without considering a clear burial and background. This raised questions about the neutrality and professionalism of the selection committee. The lack of transparency in the formation of the selection committee created an environment where political manipulation and intervention could occur.
Selection Criteria
The absence of standard criteria in determining the graduation of prospective KIP members opened opportunities for political manipulation and intervention. This made the selection process vulnerable to the interests of political parties and reduced opportunities for prospective KIP members who had integrity and competence. The lack of clear criteria created an environment where political parties could exert influence over the selection process.
Control and Supervision
Although the recruitment was carried out openly, public supervision was minimal, and the selection process was under the full control of the Pidie DPRK. The absence of controls outside the local parliament strengthened the dominance of political parties and reduced the independence of KIP. The lack of oversight and control created an environment where political parties could exert undue influence over the selection process.
Threats to Election Independence and Integrity
The dominance of the DPRK in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie posed a serious threat to the independence and integrity of the election. This is because:
Lack of Independence
KIP formed through a recruitment process that was dominated by political parties was vulnerable to political influence and pressure. This could cause KIP not to carry out its functions independently and professionally. The lack of independence created an environment where KIP could be influenced by political parties, undermining the integrity of the election.
Doubts about Neutrality
The public would doubt the neutrality and integrity of the KIP if the recruitment process was not transparent and independent. This could trigger distrust of the holding of elections and bring up the potential for conflict. The lack of transparency and independence created an environment where the public would question the legitimacy of the election.
Democracy Weakening
Recruitment process that was not democratic and transparent could weaken democracy at the local level. This could cause injustice in the political process and hamper public participation in elections. The lack of democracy and transparency created an environment where the rights of citizens were undermined.
Recommendations to Increase KIP Independence
To increase KIP independence and maintain election integrity, several important steps need to be taken:
Transparency and Accountability
The recruitment process of KIP members must be transparent and accountable. Standard standards and objective selection criteria must be applied to ensure the quality and integrity of prospective KIP members. Transparency and accountability are essential in creating an environment where the selection process is fair and unbiased.
Community Participation
Community participation in overseeing the recruitment process of KIP members is very important. Increasing access to information and public control mechanisms can help prevent political intervention and ensure a just and democratic recruitment process. Community participation is essential in creating an environment where the selection process is transparent and accountable.
Strengthening the Supervisory Institution
The role of the Election Supervisory Institution, such as Bawaslu, needs to be strengthened to ensure the recruitment process of KIP members runs in accordance with the rules and principles of democracy. Strengthening the supervisory institution is essential in creating an environment where the selection process is transparent and accountable.
Conclusion
The dominance of the DPRK in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie shows the dynamics of political interests that can threaten the independence and integrity of the election. To create an independent, professional, and integrity election organizer, reforms need to be carried out in the recruitment process of KIP members by promoting public transparency and involving various parties, including the community, to exercise control and supervision. The recommendations outlined in this study aim to increase KIP independence and maintain election integrity, ensuring that the election process is fair, transparent, and accountable.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Role of DPRK Recruitment on the Independence of the Independent Commission for the Pidie Regency Election
Q: What is the role of the Regency Representative Council (DPRK) in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie?
A: The DPRK plays a dominant role in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie, which raises concerns about the independence and integrity of the election. The DPRK is responsible for selecting the members of the KIP, and its influence can impact the fairness and transparency of the selection process.
Q: What are the implications of the DPRK's dominance in the recruitment process?
A: The DPRK's dominance in the recruitment process can lead to a lack of independence and integrity in the election. This can result in the selection of KIP members who are not qualified or who are influenced by political parties, which can undermine the legitimacy of the election.
Q: What are the key stages in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie?
A: The key stages in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie include agency formation, selection criteria, and control and supervision. These stages are critical in determining the independence and integrity of the election.
Q: What are the challenges faced by the KIP in maintaining its independence and integrity?
A: The KIP faces several challenges in maintaining its independence and integrity, including the dominance of the DPRK in the recruitment process, the lack of transparency and accountability, and the influence of political parties.
Q: What are the recommendations to increase KIP independence and maintain election integrity?
A: The recommendations to increase KIP independence and maintain election integrity include promoting public transparency and involving various parties, including the community, to exercise control and supervision. Additionally, strengthening the supervisory institution, such as Bawaslu, is essential in ensuring that the recruitment process runs in accordance with the rules and principles of democracy.
Q: What is the role of community participation in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie?
A: Community participation is essential in the recruitment process of KIP Pidie, as it can help prevent political intervention and ensure a just and democratic recruitment process. Community participation can also increase access to information and public control mechanisms, which can help maintain the integrity of the election.
Q: What are the consequences of not addressing the issues related to the recruitment process of KIP Pidie?
A: If the issues related to the recruitment process of KIP Pidie are not addressed, it can lead to a lack of confidence in the election process, which can undermine the legitimacy of the election. Additionally, it can also lead to a weakening of democracy at the local level, which can result in injustice in the political process and hamper public participation in elections.
Q: What is the significance of the study on the role of DPRK recruitment on the independence of the Independent Commission for the Pidie Regency Election?
A: The study on the role of DPRK recruitment on the independence of the Independent Commission for the Pidie Regency Election is significant as it highlights the importance of promoting public transparency and involving various parties, including the community, to exercise control and supervision in the recruitment process. The study also emphasizes the need to strengthen the supervisory institution, such as Bawaslu, to ensure that the recruitment process runs in accordance with the rules and principles of democracy.
Q: What are the implications of the study for the future of elections in Indonesia?
A: The study has implications for the future of elections in Indonesia, as it highlights the need to address the issues related to the recruitment process of KIP Pidie. The study suggests that promoting public transparency and involving various parties, including the community, to exercise control and supervision is essential in maintaining the integrity of the election. Additionally, strengthening the supervisory institution, such as Bawaslu, is also essential in ensuring that the recruitment process runs in accordance with the rules and principles of democracy.