The Development Of Electoral Democracy At The Local Level (study Of Political Polarization In The Election Of The Governor Of North Sumatra In 2018

by ADMIN 148 views

The Development of Electoral Democracy at the Local Level: Study of Political Polarization in the Election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018

Introduction

The election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 was a significant event that showcased a sharp political polarization in the community. This phenomenon was not unique to North Sumatra, as similar events had occurred in the Regional Head Election of DKI Jakarta in 2017. The rise of social media and the role of certain figures in spreading issues during political campaigns have contributed to this situation. Through the theory of affective polarity, identity politics, and electoral democracy, this study aims to explain more deeply how the form of polarization occurs in the governor election, the reason why polarization develops so sharply, and how the future of electoral democracy at the local level is affected by the political polarization.

Theoretical Framework

The concept of affective polarity refers to the emotional attachment of individuals to a particular ideology, group, or issue. This attachment can lead to a strong sense of identity and a willingness to defend one's beliefs, even if it means engaging in conflict with others. Identity politics, on the other hand, refers to the use of identity as a means of mobilizing support and creating a sense of community among individuals who share a particular characteristic, such as religion or ethnicity. Electoral democracy, as a system of government, relies on the free and fair election of representatives to make decisions on behalf of the people.

Methodology

This study employed a qualitative approach, using data from the election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018. The data was collected through a combination of interviews with key stakeholders, including candidates, campaign managers, and social media influencers, as well as a content analysis of social media posts and campaign materials. The study also drew on existing literature on political polarization, affective polarity, and electoral democracy.

Findings

The analysis of the data revealed that the polarization that occurred during the election was based on hate issues related to religion. However, interestingly, conflicts between religious communities in North Sumatra did not occur either before and after the election took place. This sharp polarization was caused by the spread of the issue of blasphemy and anti-religious accommodation through social media channels, similar to the dynamics that occurred in elections in Jakarta. Furthermore, this study shows that political polarization during regional elections can undermine local democracy and has the potential to disrupt the consolidation of democracy both at the local and national levels.

The Bounded Deliberative Campaign Model

In this context, research introduces the "Bounded Deliberrative" campaign model which is considered capable of reducing the incident of political polarization, especially related to religious issues during regional elections. This model is based on the idea that candidates should be given the opportunity to campaign and reach all levels of society, but the freedom is bound to formal regulations such as laws, general election commission regulations (KPU), government regulations, and agreements made by all elements involved. This approach emphasizes the need for regulations on the use of media and issues, figures, as well as winning volunteers involved in political campaigns.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the need for regulations on the use of media and issues, figures, as well as winning volunteers involved in political campaigns. With the right arrangement, it is expected that political polarization can be minimized, so that the democratic process at the local level can run healthier. Through this approach, the future of electoral democracy in North Sumatra and other regions in Indonesia is expected to be more maintained than the negative impact of political polarization.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. Regulations on the use of media: The government and the general election commission (KPU) should establish clear regulations on the use of media during political campaigns, including social media.
  2. Regulations on issues and figures: The government and the KPU should establish clear regulations on the issues and figures that can be used during political campaigns, including those related to religion.
  3. Regulations on winning volunteers: The government and the KPU should establish clear regulations on the use of winning volunteers during political campaigns, including those related to social media.
  4. Education and awareness: The government and civil society organizations should conduct education and awareness programs to promote the importance of electoral democracy and the need to minimize political polarization.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

  1. Limited scope: The study only focused on the election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 and did not consider other regional elections in Indonesia.
  2. Qualitative approach: The study employed a qualitative approach, which may not be representative of the broader population.
  3. Data collection: The study relied on data from social media and campaign materials, which may not be comprehensive or accurate.

Future Research

Future research should build on the findings of this study and explore the following areas:

  1. Comparative study: A comparative study of regional elections in Indonesia to identify the factors that contribute to political polarization.
  2. Quantitative approach: A quantitative approach to study the impact of political polarization on electoral democracy.
  3. Longitudinal study: A longitudinal study to examine the long-term effects of political polarization on electoral democracy.

References

  • Affective Polarity Theory (APT)
  • Identity Politics
  • Electoral Democracy
  • Bounded Deliberative Campaign Model
  • General Election Commission (KPU) Regulations
  • Government Regulations
  • Agreements made by all elements involved

Appendix

  • List of interviewees
  • List of social media posts and campaign materials analyzed
  • List of references cited in the study
    Q&A: The Development of Electoral Democracy at the Local Level

Introduction

The election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 was a significant event that showcased a sharp political polarization in the community. This phenomenon was not unique to North Sumatra, as similar events had occurred in the Regional Head Election of DKI Jakarta in 2017. The rise of social media and the role of certain figures in spreading issues during political campaigns have contributed to this situation. In this Q&A article, we will address some of the most frequently asked questions about the development of electoral democracy at the local level and the impact of political polarization.

Q: What is the main cause of political polarization in regional elections?

A: The main cause of political polarization in regional elections is the spread of hate issues related to religion through social media channels. This phenomenon was observed in the election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 and the Regional Head Election of DKI Jakarta in 2017.

Q: How does political polarization affect electoral democracy?

A: Political polarization can undermine local democracy and has the potential to disrupt the consolidation of democracy both at the local and national levels. It can also lead to the erosion of trust in institutions and the rise of extremist groups.

Q: What is the Bounded Deliberative Campaign Model?

A: The Bounded Deliberative Campaign Model is a campaign model that is considered capable of reducing the incident of political polarization, especially related to religious issues during regional elections. This model is based on the idea that candidates should be given the opportunity to campaign and reach all levels of society, but the freedom is bound to formal regulations such as laws, general election commission regulations (KPU), government regulations, and agreements made by all elements involved.

Q: What are the key recommendations of this study?

A: The key recommendations of this study are:

  1. Regulations on the use of media: The government and the general election commission (KPU) should establish clear regulations on the use of media during political campaigns, including social media.
  2. Regulations on issues and figures: The government and the KPU should establish clear regulations on the issues and figures that can be used during political campaigns, including those related to religion.
  3. Regulations on winning volunteers: The government and the KPU should establish clear regulations on the use of winning volunteers during political campaigns, including those related to social media.
  4. Education and awareness: The government and civil society organizations should conduct education and awareness programs to promote the importance of electoral democracy and the need to minimize political polarization.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including:

  1. Limited scope: The study only focused on the election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 and did not consider other regional elections in Indonesia.
  2. Qualitative approach: The study employed a qualitative approach, which may not be representative of the broader population.
  3. Data collection: The study relied on data from social media and campaign materials, which may not be comprehensive or accurate.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should build on the findings of this study and explore the following areas:

  1. Comparative study: A comparative study of regional elections in Indonesia to identify the factors that contribute to political polarization.
  2. Quantitative approach: A quantitative approach to study the impact of political polarization on electoral democracy.
  3. Longitudinal study: A longitudinal study to examine the long-term effects of political polarization on electoral democracy.

Q: What are the implications of this study for policymakers and civil society organizations?

A: The implications of this study for policymakers and civil society organizations are:

  1. Establish clear regulations: Establish clear regulations on the use of media, issues, and figures during political campaigns.
  2. Promote education and awareness: Promote education and awareness programs to promote the importance of electoral democracy and the need to minimize political polarization.
  3. Encourage dialogue and debate: Encourage dialogue and debate among stakeholders to promote a more inclusive and participatory democratic process.

Conclusion

The election of the Governor of North Sumatra in 2018 was a significant event that showcased a sharp political polarization in the community. This phenomenon was not unique to North Sumatra, as similar events had occurred in the Regional Head Election of DKI Jakarta in 2017. The rise of social media and the role of certain figures in spreading issues during political campaigns have contributed to this situation. In this Q&A article, we have addressed some of the most frequently asked questions about the development of electoral democracy at the local level and the impact of political polarization.