Student Demonstrations In Waspada Daily And Daily Analysis (Framing Analysis Of Student Demonstration News Related To The Policy Of Rising Fuel Prices In Waspada Daily And Daily Analysis)
Framing News Student Demonstration: Difference Daily Narrative Waspada and Analysis
Introduction
In 2008, Indonesia was hit by a wave of student demonstrations that opposed government policy to increase the price of fuel oil (BBM). The event sparked widespread protests and riots across the country, with students and activists demanding a reversal of the policy. Two famous print media in North Sumatra, Daily Waspada and Daily Analysis, highlighted this event with a different perspective. This study analyzes how the two dailys form a student demonstration news narrative, with a focus on the framing they use.
Background
The student demonstrations in 2008 were a significant event in Indonesian history, marking a period of intense social and political unrest. The protests were sparked by the government's decision to increase the price of fuel oil, which was seen as a major blow to the country's economy. The demonstrations were characterized by widespread riots, vandalism, and clashes between protesters and security forces.
Methodology
This study uses Zhongdang Pan and Geraldang M. Kosicki's framing analysis method, which divides framing markers into four large structures: syntax, scripts, thematic, and rhetoric. This study analyzed 21 news in the Waspada Daily and 14 news in the Daily Analysis, which was published between May and June 2008. The issue studied included the riots of BBM demonstrations, Unas incidents, and government and police responses to demonstrations.
Results
The results of the analysis show that the daily Waspada and Daily Analysis have different framing against student demonstrations. Daily Waspada tends to highlight the riots and anarchism in demonstrations, by emphasizing the incidence of violence and damage that occurs. While the Daily Analysis focuses more on the government and police response to demonstrations, displaying the efforts of the security forces in maintaining order.
The Role of Framing in Shaping Public Perception
The difference in framing is also reflected in the placement of issues. Daily Waspada, for example, discussed more about the issue of riots and anarchism, even containing news that highlighted the police statement that condemned the demonstration. Conversely, the daily analysis discusses more police preparation in securing demonstrations and government efforts in responding to student demands.
Framing and Public Opinion
The difference in framing is also seen in the second perspective of the media towards government policy. Daily Waspada tends to criticize the policy of rising fuel prices, accusing it as an incorrect policy. Conversely, the Daily Analysis tends to support the policy, consider it the right step and emphasize that student demonstrations cannot be justified.
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that the mass media has an important role in shaping public perception. Through framing, the media can choose certain information, emphasize certain aspects, and interpret an event with a specific perspective. This is important to understand, because it can affect public understanding of an issue and form public opinion.
The Importance of Critical Thinking
This research gives us a deeper understanding of how the mass media can play a role in forming public opinion, especially in the context of student demonstrations. It is essential to remember that each media has different framing and narratives, and we as readers need to be critical in analyzing the information we get.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of framing in shaping public perception. The results of the analysis show that the daily Waspada and Daily Analysis have different framing against student demonstrations, with Daily Waspada focusing on the riots and anarchism, and Daily Analysis focusing on the government and police response. This study emphasizes the need for critical thinking and media literacy, as readers need to be aware of the framing and narratives used by the media to shape public opinion.
Limitations
This study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample size of the news articles analyzed is relatively small, which may not be representative of the entire media landscape. Secondly, the study only analyzed two print media, which may not be representative of other media outlets. Finally, the study only focused on the framing of student demonstrations, which may not be applicable to other issues.
Future Research Directions
Future research directions could include analyzing the framing of other issues, such as economic or environmental issues. Additionally, researchers could explore the impact of framing on public opinion and behavior. Finally, researchers could investigate the role of social media in shaping public perception and opinion.
References
- Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
- Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
Appendices
- List of news articles analyzed
- Coding scheme used for framing analysis
- Results of framing analysis
Note: The above article is a rewritten version of the original content, with a focus on creating high-quality content and providing value to readers. The article includes headings, subheadings, and bold text to make it easier to read and understand. The article also includes a conclusion, limitations, and future research directions to provide a comprehensive overview of the study.
Frequently Asked Questions: Framing News Student Demonstration
Introduction
In our previous article, we discussed the framing of news student demonstration in two print media, Daily Waspada and Daily Analysis. The study analyzed the framing of 21 news articles in Waspada Daily and 14 news articles in Daily Analysis, published between May and June 2008. In this article, we will answer some of the frequently asked questions related to the study.
Q&A
Q: What is framing in the context of news reporting?
A: Framing refers to the way in which news is presented and interpreted by the media. It involves selecting certain information, emphasizing certain aspects, and interpreting an event with a specific perspective.
Q: How did the two print media, Daily Waspada and Daily Analysis, frame the student demonstrations?
A: Daily Waspada tended to highlight the riots and anarchism in demonstrations, emphasizing the incidence of violence and damage that occurs. On the other hand, Daily Analysis focused more on the government and police response to demonstrations, displaying the efforts of the security forces in maintaining order.
Q: What is the significance of framing in shaping public perception?
A: Framing has a significant impact on shaping public perception. By choosing certain information, emphasizing certain aspects, and interpreting an event with a specific perspective, the media can influence how the public understands an issue and forms an opinion.
Q: Can framing be biased?
A: Yes, framing can be biased. The media may select certain information that supports their perspective, while ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts it.
Q: How can readers be critical of the framing used by the media?
A: Readers can be critical of the framing used by the media by analyzing the information presented, identifying biases, and considering alternative perspectives.
Q: What are the implications of framing on public opinion and behavior?
A: Framing can have significant implications on public opinion and behavior. By influencing how the public understands an issue, framing can shape public opinion and behavior, leading to changes in policy and decision-making.
Q: Can framing be used to manipulate public opinion?
A: Yes, framing can be used to manipulate public opinion. By selecting certain information, emphasizing certain aspects, and interpreting an event with a specific perspective, the media can influence how the public understands an issue and forms an opinion.
Q: How can the media be held accountable for framing?
A: The media can be held accountable for framing by being transparent about their methods and biases, providing balanced and diverse perspectives, and engaging in critical self-reflection.
Conclusion
In conclusion, framing is a crucial aspect of news reporting that can shape public perception and influence public opinion. By understanding how framing works, readers can be critical of the media and make informed decisions. The media must also be held accountable for framing, providing balanced and diverse perspectives, and engaging in critical self-reflection.
References
- Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
- Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
Appendices
- List of news articles analyzed
- Coding scheme used for framing analysis
- Results of framing analysis
Note: The above article is a Q&A version of the original content, with a focus on providing answers to frequently asked questions related to the study. The article includes headings, subheadings, and bold text to make it easier to read and understand.