Relationship Between Sidewalk Abuse Conformity And Breakthrough Traffic Lights With Prosocial And Aggressive Driving Behavior In Motorized Motorists
Relationship between Sidewalk Abuse Conformity and Breakthrough Traffic Lights with Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Behavior in Motorized Motorists
Introduction
Traffic accidents are a major concern in urban areas, and one of the key factors contributing to these accidents is the behavior of motorists who do not comply with the rules. The conformity of sidewalk abuse and breakthrough traffic lights is an important indicator that reflects the attitudes and behavior of motorized motorists. This study aims to understand the relationship between sidewalk abuse conformity and breakthrough traffic lights with prosocial and aggressive driving behavior. To achieve these goals, correlational quantitative methods are used.
Background
According to reports from antaranews.com, Bandarlampung Police stated that traffic violations are a major factor causing accidents (Sukarta, 2019). The city of Medan, where this study was conducted, is a major urban area with a high volume of traffic. The research sample consisted of 659 motorized motorcyclists in the city of Medan, which was taken using the incidental sampling method. Data analysis is carried out through linear regression analysis, as well as testing the validity of the measuring device construct using Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmation Factor Analysis.
Hypothesis and Methodology
The proposed hypothesis in this study is that the conformity of sidewalk abuse and the breakthrough of traffic lights is negatively related to prosocial behavior (hypothesis 1), and positively related to aggressive behavior (hypothesis 2). To test these hypotheses, a correlational quantitative method was used. The data was collected using a survey questionnaire that was administered to 659 motorized motorcyclists in the city of Medan. The questionnaire consisted of questions related to sidewalk abuse conformity, breakthrough traffic lights, prosocial behavior, and aggressive behavior.
Results
The results of hypothesis testing show that the two hypotheses are supported by data. This shows that the low conformity in sidewalk abuse and the breakthrough of traffic lights play a role in predicting prosocial behavior, while high conformity in these behavior correlates with increasing aggressive behavior that has the potential to cause traffic violations.
Discussion
Traffic accidents in urban areas are often triggered by various factors, one of which is the behavior of motorists who do not comply with the rules. In this context, the conformity of sidewalk abuse and breakthrough traffic lights is an important indicator that reflects the attitudes and behavior of the rider. When drivers feel that they can violate the rules without serious consequences, they tend to be more aggressive and less concerned about the safety of others.
Conversely, motorists who show prosocial behavior tend to comply with rules, respect traffic lights, and do not use sidewalks as a path for their vehicles. This shows that traffic education that emphasizes social awareness and responsibility for fellow road users is very important. The community needs to be encouraged to behave more prosocial in driving, which includes giving way to pedestrians, obeying traffic signs, and avoiding aggressive behavior on the road.
Conclusion
This research also underlines the importance of law enforcement that is consistent with traffic violations. If firm action is taken against motorists who violate, this can create a deterrent effect and encourage motorists to further comply with the rules, which in turn can reduce the number of accidents. In addition, a public awareness campaign that encourages good driving behavior can contribute positively in building a safer driving environment.
Recommendation
With a better understanding of the relationship between the conformity of traffic behavior and driving behavior, it is hoped that effective prevention steps can be applied to improve traffic safety, which will ultimately reduce the number of accidents on the highway. Through joint efforts, both from the government, related institutions, and the community, we can create a better and better driving culture.
Limitation
This study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample size was limited to 659 motorized motorcyclists in the city of Medan. Secondly, the study only focused on motorized motorcyclists and did not include other types of motorized vehicles. Finally, the study only measured the relationship between sidewalk abuse conformity and breakthrough traffic lights with prosocial and aggressive driving behavior and did not explore other factors that may contribute to traffic accidents.
Future Research
Future research can build on the findings of this study by exploring other factors that contribute to traffic accidents. For example, researchers can investigate the relationship between traffic education and traffic safety, or the impact of law enforcement on traffic behavior. Additionally, researchers can explore the role of technology in improving traffic safety, such as the use of traffic cameras and speed cameras.
References
Sukarta, A. (2019). Traffic Violations Cause Accidents. Antaranews.com.
Appendix
The appendix includes the survey questionnaire used in this study, as well as the data analysis procedures used to test the hypotheses.
Q&A: Relationship between Sidewalk Abuse Conformity and Breakthrough Traffic Lights with Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Behavior in Motorized Motorists
Q: What is the main objective of this study?
A: The main objective of this study is to understand the relationship between sidewalk abuse conformity and breakthrough traffic lights with prosocial and aggressive driving behavior in motorized motorists.
Q: What is sidewalk abuse conformity?
A: Sidewalk abuse conformity refers to the behavior of motorized motorists who use sidewalks as a path for their vehicles, ignoring the rules and regulations that prohibit such behavior.
Q: What is breakthrough traffic lights?
A: Breakthrough traffic lights refer to the behavior of motorized motorists who ignore or break through traffic lights, disregarding the rules and regulations that govern traffic flow.
Q: What is prosocial behavior?
A: Prosocial behavior refers to the behavior of motorized motorists who comply with rules, respect traffic lights, and do not use sidewalks as a path for their vehicles.
Q: What is aggressive behavior?
A: Aggressive behavior refers to the behavior of motorized motorists who are more likely to engage in reckless and irresponsible driving, such as speeding, tailgating, and ignoring traffic signals.
Q: What are the implications of this study?
A: The implications of this study are that sidewalk abuse conformity and breakthrough traffic lights are associated with aggressive behavior, while prosocial behavior is associated with compliance with rules and regulations. This suggests that traffic education and enforcement efforts should focus on promoting prosocial behavior and discouraging aggressive behavior.
Q: What are the limitations of this study?
A: The limitations of this study include a sample size of 659 motorized motorcyclists in the city of Medan, and the study only focused on motorized motorcyclists and did not include other types of motorized vehicles.
Q: What are the recommendations of this study?
A: The recommendations of this study include the need for traffic education and enforcement efforts to focus on promoting prosocial behavior and discouraging aggressive behavior. Additionally, the study suggests that law enforcement should be consistent in enforcing traffic laws and regulations.
Q: What are the future research directions of this study?
A: The future research directions of this study include exploring other factors that contribute to traffic accidents, such as the relationship between traffic education and traffic safety, and the impact of law enforcement on traffic behavior.
Q: What are the practical applications of this study?
A: The practical applications of this study include the development of effective traffic education and enforcement programs that promote prosocial behavior and discourage aggressive behavior. Additionally, the study suggests that law enforcement should be consistent in enforcing traffic laws and regulations.
Q: What are the policy implications of this study?
A: The policy implications of this study include the need for policymakers to develop and implement effective traffic education and enforcement programs that promote prosocial behavior and discourage aggressive behavior. Additionally, policymakers should ensure that law enforcement is consistent in enforcing traffic laws and regulations.
Q: What are the social implications of this study?
A: The social implications of this study include the need for society to promote prosocial behavior and discourage aggressive behavior. Additionally, the study suggests that society should prioritize traffic safety and work towards reducing the number of traffic accidents.