Rehan Proved By Mathematical Induction That For All Positive Integers, $n^3 + 2n$ Is Divisible By 3. Can You Find An Integer Counterexample To Show That This Statement Is Not True? Explain.

Introduction

In mathematics, a statement is considered true if it holds for all possible values of the variables involved. However, a counterexample can prove that a statement is false. In this article, we will examine a statement made by Rehan, which claims that for all positive integers, $n^3 + 2n$ is divisible by 3. We will attempt to find an integer counterexample to show that this statement is not true.

Understanding the Statement

The statement made by Rehan can be written as:

$$\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}^+, n^3 + 2n \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$$

This statement claims that for any positive integer $n$, the expression $n^3 + 2n$ is divisible by 3.

Mathematical Induction

Rehan has already proved this statement using mathematical induction. However, we will not delve into the details of his proof. Instead, we will focus on finding a counterexample to show that this statement is not true.

Finding a Counterexample

To find a counterexample, we need to find a positive integer $n$ such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. Let's start by plugging in some small positive integers to see if we can find a counterexample.

• For $n = 1$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 1^3 + 2(1) = 3$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 2$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 2^3 + 2(2) = 12$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 3$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 3^3 + 2(3) = 33$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 4$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 4^3 + 2(4) = 72$, which is divisible by 3.

It seems that the statement holds true for the first few positive integers. However, we need to keep searching for a counterexample.

A Counterexample

After trying a few more positive integers, we finally find a counterexample.

• For $n = 5$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 5^3 + 2(5) = 135$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 6$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 6^3 + 2(6) = 252$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 7$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 7^3 + 2(7) = 399$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 8$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 8^3 + 2(8) = 576$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 9$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 9^3 + 2(9) = 810$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 10$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 10^3 + 2(10) = 1050$, which is divisible by 3.
• For $n = 11$, we have $n^3 + 2n = 11^3 + 2(11) = 1331$, which is not divisible by 3.

We have finally found a counterexample! For $n = 11$, the expression $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3.

Conclusion

In this article, we have shown that Rehan's statement is not true. We have found a counterexample, $n = 11$, such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. This counterexample proves that the statement is false.

Counterexample Summary

$n$	$n^3 + 2n$	Divisible by 3
1	3	Yes
2	12	Yes
3	33	Yes
4	72	Yes
5	135	Yes
6	252	Yes
7	399	Yes
8	576	Yes
9	810	Yes
10	1050	Yes
11	1331	No

Note that the counterexample $n = 11$ is a positive integer, and the expression $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3.

Final Thoughts

$$$$

Introduction

In our previous article, we showed that Rehan's statement, which claims that for all positive integers, $n^3 + 2n$ is divisible by 3, is not true. We found a counterexample, $n = 11$, such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to this topic.

Q&A

Q: What is a counterexample?

A: A counterexample is an example that shows a statement is false. In this case, we found a counterexample, $n = 11$, such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3.

Q: Why is the statement false?

A: The statement is false because we found a counterexample, $n = 11$, such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. This means that the statement does not hold true for all positive integers.

Q: Can we prove that the statement is false using mathematical induction?

A: No, we cannot prove that the statement is false using mathematical induction. Mathematical induction is a method used to prove that a statement is true for all positive integers. However, in this case, we found a counterexample that shows the statement is false.

Q: What is the significance of the counterexample?

A: The counterexample, $n = 11$, shows that the statement is not true for all positive integers. This means that the statement is false, and we cannot use mathematical induction to prove it.

Q: Can we find another counterexample?

A: Yes, we can find another counterexample. However, we need to find a positive integer $n$ such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. We can try different values of $n$ to find another counterexample.

Q: How can we use counterexamples in mathematics?

A: Counterexamples are an important tool in mathematics. They can be used to show that a statement is false, and they can also be used to prove that a statement is true. By finding counterexamples, we can gain a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts and develop new mathematical theories.

Q: What is the relationship between counterexamples and mathematical induction?

A: Counterexamples and mathematical induction are related in that they can be used to prove or disprove a statement. Mathematical induction is a method used to prove that a statement is true for all positive integers, while counterexamples can be used to show that a statement is false.

Q: Can we use counterexamples to prove that a statement is true?

A: No, counterexamples cannot be used to prove that a statement is true. However, they can be used to show that a statement is false.

Q: How can we find counterexamples?

A: To find counterexamples, we need to try different values of the variable and see if the statement holds true or false. We can also use mathematical software or calculators to help us find counterexamples.

Q: What is the importance of finding counterexamples?

A: Finding counterexamples is important because it can help us develop new mathematical theories and gain a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts. It can also help us identify areas where mathematical theories may be incomplete or incorrect.

Conclusion

In this article, we answered some frequently asked questions related to Rehan's divisibility statement and counterexamples. We hope that this article has provided a clear understanding of the concept of counterexamples and how they can be used to prove or disprove a statement.

Counterexample Summary

$n$	$n^3 + 2n$	Divisible by 3
1	3	Yes
2	12	Yes
3	33	Yes
4	72	Yes
5	135	Yes
6	252	Yes
7	399	Yes
8	576	Yes
9	810	Yes
10	1050	Yes
11	1331	No

Note that the counterexample $n = 11$ is a positive integer, and the expression $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, we have shown that Rehan's statement is not true. We have found a counterexample, $n = 11$, such that $n^3 + 2n$ is not divisible by 3. This counterexample proves that the statement is false. We hope that this article has provided a clear understanding of the concept of counterexamples and how they can be used to prove or disprove a statement.