Question On Eliminating Repeated Generated Expressions.
Introduction
The GrammaticalEvolution package is a powerful tool for generating mathematical expressions. However, it can sometimes produce identical expressions, which may not be desirable in certain situations. Additionally, the package may generate expressions that result in errors or NAs, which can be a weakness. In this article, we will explore ways to eliminate repeated generated expressions and disallow function combinations that result in errors or NAs.
Understanding the Issue
The issue of repeated generated expressions is due to the way the GrammaticalEvolution package works. It uses a grammar-based approach to generate expressions, where the grammar rules are defined by the user. In this case, the grammar rules are defined by the grammarDef
parameter, which is a list of rules that define the structure of the expressions.
The grammarDef
parameter is defined in the create_grammar_wrapper
function, which is a wrapper function that creates a grammar definition based on the input data and parameters. The grammar definition is then used to generate expressions using the GrammaticalEvolution package.
Disallowing Function Combinations that Result in Errors or NAs
One way to disallow function combinations that result in errors or NAs is to modify the grammar rules to exclude these combinations. For example, we can add a rule that excludes the sqrt
function when the input is negative, or the log
function when the input is zero or negative.
We can also use the eval
function to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA, and if so, return a special value such as _Inf_
.
Modifying the Grammar Rules
To modify the grammar rules, we can add new rules that exclude the function combinations that result in errors or NAs. For example, we can add a rule that excludes the sqrt
function when the input is negative:
ruleDef <- list(
expr = grule(op(expr, expr), func(expr), var),
func = do.call(grule, functions), # Ensure function set includes `exp`
op = do.call(grule, operators),
var = do.call(grule, c(variables, constants)),
sqrt = grule(sqrt(var), condition = function(x) x >= 0)
)
We can also add a rule that excludes the log
function when the input is zero or negative:
ruleDef <- list(
expr = grule(op(expr, expr), func(expr), var),
func = do.call(grule, functions), # Ensure function set includes `exp`
op = do.call(grule, operators),
var = do.call(grule, c(variables, constants)),
log = grule(log(var), condition = function(x) x > 0)
)
Using the eval
Function
To check if the generated expression results in an error or NA, we can use the eval
function. We can modify the eval
function to return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA:
eval <- function(expr) {
tryCatch(
expr = expr,
error = function(e) {
return(_Inf_)
},
warning = function(w) {
return(_Inf_)
}
)
}
Example Code
Here is an example of how to modify the grammar rules and use the eval
function to disallow function combinations that result in errors or NAs:
create_grammar_wrapper <- function(data,
operators = c("+", "-", "*", "/", "^"),
functions = c('log', 'sqrt', 'exp'),
variables,
constants = c(1, 2, pi)) {
ivCol <- variables # Preserve variable names
variables <- syms(paste0("data{{content}}quot;,ivCol))
functions <- syms(functions)
operators <- syms(operators)
# Define grammar rules
ruleDef <- list(
expr = grule(op(expr, expr), func(expr), var),
func = do.call(grule, functions), # Ensure function set includes `exp`
op = do.call(grule, operators),
var = do.call(grule, c(variables, constants)),
sqrt = grule(sqrt(var), condition = function(x) x >= 0),
log = grule(log(var), condition = function(x) x > 0)
)
# Create the grammar definition
grammarDef <- CreateGrammar(ruleDef)
# Define the eval function
eval <- function(expr) {
tryCatch(
expr = expr,
error = function(e) {
return(_Inf_)
},
warning = function(w) {
return(_Inf_)
}
)
}
return(c(
list(
name = variables,
known_entropy = data$entropy,
grammarDef = grammarDef,
eval = eval
),
setNames(lapply(ivCol, function(col) data[[col]]), ivCol) # Dynamically add multiple elements
))
}
Conclusion
Q: What is the main issue with the GrammaticalEvolution package?
A: The main issue with the GrammaticalEvolution package is that it can sometimes produce identical expressions, which may not be desirable in certain situations. Additionally, the package may generate expressions that result in errors or NAs, which can be a weakness.
Q: How can I modify the grammar rules to disallow function combinations that result in errors or NAs?
A: You can modify the grammar rules to exclude the function combinations that result in errors or NAs. For example, you can add a rule that excludes the sqrt
function when the input is negative, or the log
function when the input is zero or negative.
Q: How can I use the eval
function to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA?
A: You can use the eval
function to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA. You can modify the eval
function to return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA.
Q: What is the difference between the eval
function and the grammarDef
parameter?
A: The eval
function is used to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA, while the grammarDef
parameter is used to define the grammar rules for generating expressions.
Q: How can I dynamically add multiple elements to the grammar definition?
A: You can dynamically add multiple elements to the grammar definition by using the setNames
function to add multiple elements to the list.
Q: What is the purpose of the condition
parameter in the grammar rules?
A: The condition
parameter in the grammar rules is used to specify the conditions under which a particular rule should be applied.
Q: How can I ensure that the exp
function is included in the grammar definition?
A: You can ensure that the exp
function is included in the grammar definition by adding it to the functions
list.
Q: What is the difference between the grule
function and the do.call
function?
A: The grule
function is used to define a new rule, while the do.call
function is used to apply a function to a list of arguments.
Q: How can I modify the grammar rules to exclude certain function combinations?
A: You can modify the grammar rules to exclude certain function combinations by adding new rules that exclude these combinations.
Q: What is the purpose of the tryCatch
function in the eval
function?
A: The tryCatch
function in the eval
function is used to catch any errors or warnings that may occur when evaluating the expression.
Q: How can I return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA?
A: You can return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA by using the return
statement in the eval
function.
Q: What is the difference between the eval
function and the grammarDef
parameter in terms of error handling?
A: The eval
function is used to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA, while the grammarDef
parameter is used to define the grammar rules for generating expressions. The eval
function is more flexible in terms of error handling, as it can return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA.
Q: How can I use the eval
function to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA in a more flexible way?
A: You can use the eval
function to check if the generated expression results in an error or NA in a more flexible way by using the tryCatch
function to catch any errors or warnings that may occur when evaluating the expression. You can also use the return
statement to return a special value such as _Inf_
if the expression results in an error or NA.