Provision Of Refugee Compensation On Manus Island In Terms Of Human Rights And International Law Perspectives

by ADMIN 110 views

Provision of Refugee Compensation on Manus Island: An Overview from the Perspective of Human Rights and International Law

Introduction

The protection of refugees is a critical issue that is closely tied to human rights (HAM). Refugees are individuals who seek to escape threats, war, or persecution in their home country and are entitled to basic rights in their lives. In this context, Australia, as one of the countries that has signed the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status, implemented a policy called the Pacific Solution. This policy stipulates that refugees or asylum seekers entering Australia by sea will not be allowed to enter the country's territory and will be transferred to a third country, one of which is the detention center on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea. However, the conditions at the detention center have been alarming and have garnered extensive criticism.

Background

The Pacific Solution was a policy implemented by the Australian government to manage the influx of refugees and asylum seekers arriving by sea. The policy was designed to prevent refugees from entering Australia's territory and to transfer them to a third country for processing and detention. Manus Island, Papua New Guinea, was one of the countries chosen for this purpose. However, the conditions at the detention center on Manus Island have been widely criticized for being inhumane and violating the basic rights of refugees.

Reports of Inhumane Conditions

Various reports have highlighted the inhumane conditions at the detention center on Manus Island. Refugees have been subjected to overcrowding, poor living conditions, and inadequate access to basic necessities such as food, water, and healthcare. The reports have also highlighted the use of force and violence by detention center staff against refugees. These conditions have led to widespread criticism and condemnation from human rights organizations and the international community.

The Lawsuit and Compensation

In response to the criticism and condemnation, a group of refugees and asylum seekers on Manus Island sued the Australian government in the Supreme Court of the state of Victoria. The lawsuit sought compensation for the harm and suffering caused by the inhumane conditions at the detention center. After a lengthy legal battle, the Australian government agreed to pay compensation to the refugees and asylum seekers who were detained on Manus Island.

Compensation Payment

The Australian government agreed to pay AUS $70 million (approximately Rp. 700 billion) to around 13,300 refugees and asylum seekers who were detained on Manus Island. This compensation payment is a significant step towards acknowledging the harm and suffering caused by the inhumane conditions at the detention center. However, it is also important to note that the compensation payment cannot fully restore the basic rights that were violated.

International Law and Refugee Protection

Australia's obligation to provide proper protection to refugees is clear in the framework of international law. The 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status establish the principles and guidelines for the protection of refugees. The Convention requires countries to provide refugees with basic rights and protections, including the right to seek asylum, the right to non-refoulement (not to be returned to a country where they would face persecution), and the right to fair and efficient procedures for determining refugee status.

Australia's Obligations

Australia's obligations under international law are clear. The country has a duty to provide refugees with proper protection and to ensure that they are treated with dignity and respect. The Australian government's policies related to refugees on Manus Island have been widely criticized for violating international law. The policies have been seen as a breach of Australia's obligations under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status.

Conclusion

The provision of refugee compensation on Manus Island is a significant step towards acknowledging the harm and suffering caused by the inhumane conditions at the detention center. However, it is also important to note that the compensation payment cannot fully restore the basic rights that were violated. The Australian government's policies related to refugees on Manus Island have been widely criticized for violating international law. The policies have been seen as a breach of Australia's obligations under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status.

Recommendations

In light of the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. The Australian government should review its policies related to refugees and asylum seekers to ensure that they are in line with international law and human rights principles.
  2. The government should provide proper protection to refugees and ensure that they are treated with dignity and respect.
  3. The government should provide compensation to all refugees and asylum seekers who were detained on Manus Island, regardless of their nationality or status.
  4. The government should take steps to prevent similar situations from arising in the future, including the establishment of a robust and efficient refugee protection system.

References

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2022). The 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status.
  • Australian Government. (2022). Pacific Solution.
  • Human Rights Watch. (2022). Australia: Refugees on Manus Island Face Inhumane Conditions.
  • Amnesty International. (2022). Australia: Refugees on Manus Island Face Abuse and Neglect.

Future Research Directions

This study has highlighted the importance of protecting refugees and ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect. Future research should focus on the following areas:

  1. The impact of the Pacific Solution on refugees and asylum seekers.
  2. The effectiveness of the compensation payment in restoring the basic rights of refugees.
  3. The role of international law in protecting refugees and ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect.
  4. The need for a robust and efficient refugee protection system in Australia.

By conducting further research in these areas, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex issues surrounding refugee protection and the importance of upholding human rights principles.
Frequently Asked Questions: Provision of Refugee Compensation on Manus Island

Q: What is the Pacific Solution?

A: The Pacific Solution is a policy implemented by the Australian government to manage the influx of refugees and asylum seekers arriving by sea. The policy was designed to prevent refugees from entering Australia's territory and to transfer them to a third country for processing and detention.

Q: Why was Manus Island chosen as a detention center?

A: Manus Island, Papua New Guinea, was chosen as a detention center because of its remote location and the fact that it was not a signatory to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on Refugee Status. This meant that Australia could transfer refugees to Manus Island without being bound by the same international law obligations as it was in Australia.

Q: What were the conditions like at the detention center on Manus Island?

A: The conditions at the detention center on Manus Island were widely criticized for being inhumane. Refugees were subjected to overcrowding, poor living conditions, and inadequate access to basic necessities such as food, water, and healthcare. The reports also highlighted the use of force and violence by detention center staff against refugees.

Q: What was the outcome of the lawsuit against the Australian government?

A: The lawsuit against the Australian government was successful, and the government agreed to pay compensation to around 13,300 refugees and asylum seekers who were detained on Manus Island. The compensation payment was AUS $70 million (approximately Rp. 700 billion).

Q: What are the implications of the compensation payment?

A: The compensation payment is a significant step towards acknowledging the harm and suffering caused by the inhumane conditions at the detention center. However, it is also important to note that the compensation payment cannot fully restore the basic rights that were violated.

Q: What are the obligations of Australia under international law?

A: Australia's obligations under international law are clear. The country has a duty to provide refugees with proper protection and to ensure that they are treated with dignity and respect. The Australian government's policies related to refugees on Manus Island have been widely criticized for violating international law.

Q: What are the recommendations for the Australian government?

A: The following recommendations are made:

  1. The Australian government should review its policies related to refugees and asylum seekers to ensure that they are in line with international law and human rights principles.
  2. The government should provide proper protection to refugees and ensure that they are treated with dignity and respect.
  3. The government should provide compensation to all refugees and asylum seekers who were detained on Manus Island, regardless of their nationality or status.
  4. The government should take steps to prevent similar situations from arising in the future, including the establishment of a robust and efficient refugee protection system.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should focus on the following areas:

  1. The impact of the Pacific Solution on refugees and asylum seekers.
  2. The effectiveness of the compensation payment in restoring the basic rights of refugees.
  3. The role of international law in protecting refugees and ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect.
  4. The need for a robust and efficient refugee protection system in Australia.

By conducting further research in these areas, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex issues surrounding refugee protection and the importance of upholding human rights principles.