Property For Riverbanks (anthropological Study Of The Babura River Settlement Community Medan As A Slum Related To The View Of Property)

Feb 27, 2025 by ADMIN 137 views

Property for Riverbanks: An Anthropological Study of the Babura River Settlement Community in Medan

Introduction

The concept of property is often associated with wealth, material possessions, and economic stability. However, in the context of the Babura River Settlement Community in Medan, property takes on a more nuanced meaning. This community, often stigmatized as a slum, has a unique perspective on property that goes beyond the traditional definition of wealth. This article aims to explore the anthropological study of the Babura River Settlement Community and their understanding of property.

Socio-Economic Context

The Babura River Settlement Community is located in the VII neighborhood, Petisah Tengah Village, Medan Petisah District, Medan Municipality, North Sumatra Province. This community is often associated with weak economic conditions, and the public perception of property is often limited to material possessions and bank accounts. However, this research aims to explore the non-material aspects of property and how it is perceived by the community.

Research Methods

This study employed qualitative ethnographic methods, including observation, in-depth interviews, and literature studies. The researchers aimed to analyze public knowledge about property and describe the socio-economic lives of the community members more precisely. Through interviews with the head of the family and other community members, the data obtained revealed their views on property.

Definition of Assets in the Context of Society

The results of the study showed that the community members categorize property into two types: material and non-material. Material property includes physical goods and money, while non-material assets include health, self-esteem, and more abstract social values. This approach reflects that society is not only trapped in the definition of narrow property but is able to understand and interpret wealth in a broader form.

Cultural Value and Utilization of Assets

With the categorization and deep understanding of property, the community on the riverbank can utilize and utilize the assets they have more effectively. They realize that even though their settlement conditions are inadequate, this does not dampen their enthusiasm to create values in everyday life. Through this view, they continue to uphold existing cultural values, which can be the basis for strengthening the community and building social solidarity between them.

The Significance of Non-Material Assets

The community's understanding of non-material assets, such as health and self-esteem, is a crucial aspect of their property concept. These assets are not financially measured but are considered valuable nonetheless. This approach highlights the importance of non-material values in the community's welfare and reflects the cultural wealth and social values that exist in the midst of difficulties.

Conclusion

This research provides valuable insight into how people on the edge of the Babura River view property. Even though they live in conditions that are considered slums, they are able to see wealth from a broader perspective and understand that the existence of property is not always bound to economic values. The community's understanding of property is a reflection of their cultural wealth and social values, which can be the basis for strengthening the community and building social solidarity between them.

Implications for Policy and Practice

This study has implications for policy and practice in the context of property and poverty alleviation. It highlights the need to move beyond the traditional definition of property and to recognize the importance of non-material assets in the community's welfare. This approach can inform policies and programs aimed at poverty alleviation and community development, taking into account the unique perspective of the community on property.

Recommendations for Future Research

This study provides a foundation for future research on the concept of property and its relationship to poverty and community development. Future studies can explore the application of this concept in different contexts and cultures, and can examine the impact of policies and programs aimed at poverty alleviation and community development on the community's understanding of property.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the research. Future studies can address these limitations by conducting a larger-scale study and exploring the concept of property in different contexts and cultures.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a unique perspective on the concept of property and its relationship to poverty and community development. The community's understanding of property is a reflection of their cultural wealth and social values, which can be the basis for strengthening the community and building social solidarity between them. This study has implications for policy and practice and provides a foundation for future research on the concept of property and its relationship to poverty and community development.
Q&A: Property for Riverbanks - An Anthropological Study of the Babura River Settlement Community in Medan

Introduction

The concept of property is often associated with wealth, material possessions, and economic stability. However, in the context of the Babura River Settlement Community in Medan, property takes on a more nuanced meaning. This community, often stigmatized as a slum, has a unique perspective on property that goes beyond the traditional definition of wealth. In this Q&A article, we will explore the findings of the anthropological study of the Babura River Settlement Community and their understanding of property.

Q: What is the significance of property in the context of the Babura River Settlement Community?

A: The community's understanding of property is a reflection of their cultural wealth and social values. They categorize property into two types: material and non-material. Material property includes physical goods and money, while non-material assets include health, self-esteem, and more abstract social values.

Q: How does the community define non-material assets?

A: Non-material assets, such as health and self-esteem, are considered valuable by the community, even though they are not financially measured. This approach highlights the importance of non-material values in the community's welfare and reflects the cultural wealth and social values that exist in the midst of difficulties.

Q: What are the implications of the community's understanding of property for policy and practice?

A: This study has implications for policy and practice in the context of property and poverty alleviation. It highlights the need to move beyond the traditional definition of property and to recognize the importance of non-material assets in the community's welfare. This approach can inform policies and programs aimed at poverty alleviation and community development, taking into account the unique perspective of the community on property.

Q: How can the findings of this study be applied in different contexts and cultures?

A: The findings of this study can be applied in different contexts and cultures by recognizing the importance of non-material assets in the community's welfare. This approach can inform policies and programs aimed at poverty alleviation and community development, taking into account the unique perspective of the community on property.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the research. Future studies can address these limitations by conducting a larger-scale study and exploring the concept of property in different contexts and cultures.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: This study provides a foundation for future research on the concept of property and its relationship to poverty and community development. Future studies can explore the application of this concept in different contexts and cultures, and can examine the impact of policies and programs aimed at poverty alleviation and community development on the community's understanding of property.

Q: What are the key takeaways from this study?

A: The key takeaways from this study are:

The community's understanding of property is a reflection of their cultural wealth and social values.
Non-material assets, such as health and self-esteem, are considered valuable by the community.
The community's understanding of property has implications for policy and practice in the context of property and poverty alleviation.
The findings of this study can be applied in different contexts and cultures by recognizing the importance of non-material assets in the community's welfare.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this Q&A article provides a summary of the findings of the anthropological study of the Babura River Settlement Community and their understanding of property. The community's understanding of property is a reflection of their cultural wealth and social values, and has implications for policy and practice in the context of property and poverty alleviation.