Politics Of The Clientelism Of The Syahrial-Waris Pair In The Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election In 2020

by ADMIN 111 views

The Politics of Clientelism in the Syahrial-Waris Pair's 2020 Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election

Introduction

The resignation of President Suharto in 1998 marked a significant turning point in Indonesia's political landscape. The subsequent implementation of regional autonomy has given citizens the power to elect their regional leaders through regional head elections (Pilkada). However, this new system has also led to the rise of clientelism, a practice where leaders use money, goods, or services to secure votes. This phenomenon has been observed in various regions, including the 2020 Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election, where the Syahrial-Waris pair employed clientelistic tactics to secure their victory.

The Rise of Clientelism in Indonesia

Since the introduction of regional autonomy, Indonesia has witnessed a significant increase in regional head elections. However, this new system has also led to the emergence of clientelism, a practice that has been observed in various regions. Clientelism is a form of politics where leaders use money, goods, or services to secure votes. This practice has been identified as a major obstacle to the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia.

The Syahrial-Waris Pair's Clientelistic Tactics

The Syahrial-Waris pair's victory in the 2020 Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election was largely attributed to their effective use of clientelistic tactics. The pair mobilized money politics, leveraging the head of the environment to distribute funds to potential voters. They also utilized community organizations, such as Pancasila and Pujakesuma Youth, to mobilize support. Furthermore, the pair received direction from the State Civil Apparatus (ASN), which further solidified their position.

The Role of the Golkar Party

One of the unique findings of this study is the active role of the Golkar Party in encouraging the practice of clientelism. The party assigned the chairman of the environment to carry out these actions, demonstrating a more proactive approach to clientelism than previously observed. This discovery highlights the potential for political parties to play a more significant role in organizing and supporting clientelistic practices to achieve specific political goals.

The Implications of Clientelism

The practice of clientelism has significant implications for the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia. It reflects the weaknesses of the existing political system, where leaders prioritize short-term gains over long-term development. The self-confidence of prospective leaders in political competition and public dissatisfaction with socioeconomic conditions can trigger unethical practices in the political arena. This demands more attention from policymakers to evaluate and improve the political system to be more transparent and accountable.

Conclusion

This research opens a broader discussion about political practices in Indonesia, particularly regarding the implications of regional autonomy on the high practice of clientelism. Realizing this practice, it is hoped that the community can be more critical in assessing prospective leaders and making wiser decisions in future elections. The findings of this study highlight the need for policymakers to address the root causes of clientelism, including the weaknesses of the existing political system and the self-confidence of prospective leaders.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. Strengthen the political system: Policymakers should evaluate and improve the political system to be more transparent and accountable.
  2. Promote critical thinking: The community should be more critical in assessing prospective leaders and making wiser decisions in future elections.
  3. Address socioeconomic conditions: Policymakers should address public dissatisfaction with socioeconomic conditions to reduce the likelihood of clientelistic practices.
  4. Regulate political parties: Political parties should be regulated to prevent their involvement in clientelistic practices.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

  1. Case study design: The study is based on a case study design, which may limit its generalizability.
  2. Qualitative approach: The study uses a qualitative approach, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.
  3. Limited data: The study relies on limited data, which may not be representative of the broader population.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to:

  1. Examine the prevalence of clientelism: Investigate the prevalence of clientelism in various regions and elections.
  2. Analyze the impact of clientelism: Examine the impact of clientelism on the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia.
  3. Develop strategies to prevent clientelism: Identify strategies to prevent clientelism and promote a more transparent and accountable political system.
    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Politics of Clientelism in the Syahrial-Waris Pair's 2020 Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election

Q: What is clientelism?

A: Clientelism is a form of politics where leaders use money, goods, or services to secure votes. This practice has been identified as a major obstacle to the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia.

Q: What is the significance of the Syahrial-Waris pair's victory in the 2020 Tanjungbalai City Regional Head Election?

A: The Syahrial-Waris pair's victory was largely attributed to their effective use of clientelistic tactics, including money politics, mobilization of community organizations, and direction from the State Civil Apparatus (ASN). This study highlights the significance of their victory in understanding the practice of clientelism in Indonesia.

Q: What is the role of the Golkar Party in the Syahrial-Waris pair's victory?

A: The Golkar Party played an active role in encouraging the practice of clientelism by assigning the chairman of the environment to carry out these actions. This discovery highlights the potential for political parties to play a more significant role in organizing and supporting clientelistic practices to achieve specific political goals.

Q: What are the implications of clientelism for the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia?

A: The practice of clientelism reflects the weaknesses of the existing political system, where leaders prioritize short-term gains over long-term development. It also highlights the need for policymakers to address the root causes of clientelism, including the weaknesses of the existing political system and the self-confidence of prospective leaders.

Q: What are the recommendations for policymakers to address the practice of clientelism?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. Strengthen the political system: Policymakers should evaluate and improve the political system to be more transparent and accountable.
  2. Promote critical thinking: The community should be more critical in assessing prospective leaders and making wiser decisions in future elections.
  3. Address socioeconomic conditions: Policymakers should address public dissatisfaction with socioeconomic conditions to reduce the likelihood of clientelistic practices.
  4. Regulate political parties: Political parties should be regulated to prevent their involvement in clientelistic practices.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

  1. Case study design: The study is based on a case study design, which may limit its generalizability.
  2. Qualitative approach: The study uses a qualitative approach, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.
  3. Limited data: The study relies on limited data, which may not be representative of the broader population.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: Future research should aim to:

  1. Examine the prevalence of clientelism: Investigate the prevalence of clientelism in various regions and elections.
  2. Analyze the impact of clientelism: Examine the impact of clientelism on the development of a healthy democracy in Indonesia.
  3. Develop strategies to prevent clientelism: Identify strategies to prevent clientelism and promote a more transparent and accountable political system.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the broader community?

A: This study highlights the need for the community to be more critical in assessing prospective leaders and making wiser decisions in future elections. It also emphasizes the importance of policymakers addressing the root causes of clientelism to promote a more transparent and accountable political system.