Perception Of USU FISIP Communication Students On The Communication Process In Thesis Guidance (Quantitative Descriptive Study Of The Perception Of USU FISIP Communication Students On The Communication Process In Thesis Guidance)

Feb 28, 2025 by ADMIN 230 views

USU FISIP Communication Student Perception of the Communication Process in Thesis Guidance: Quantitative Descriptive Study

Introduction

Thesis guidance is a crucial stage in a student's academic journey, and its success is heavily influenced by the effectiveness of communication in the guidance process. The communication process between students and supervisors plays a vital role in determining the outcome of the thesis. This study aims to describe the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance.

Background

Thesis guidance is a critical component of a student's academic journey, and its success is heavily influenced by the effectiveness of communication in the guidance process. The communication process between students and supervisors is essential in determining the outcome of the thesis. Effective communication in thesis guidance can lead to better understanding, motivation, and direction, ultimately resulting in a higher quality thesis.

Methodology

This study uses a descriptive quantitative approach with the population of all USU FISIP communication students who are actively working on their thesis and have completed their thesis in the period January 2012 to June 2013. A sample of 61 students was selected using proportional sampling methods and simple random sampling. Data was collected through the Questionnaire Method (Field Research) and Library Research Study. Data analysis was carried out using a single table analysis and SPSS 16 software assistance.

Results

The results showed that the communication process between students and supervisors was generally considered effective by students. Most students feel the communication process in thesis guidance provides good motivation, knowledge, and direction. Student perception of the communication process in the thesis guidance is classified as positive.

However, there are still a small number of students who assess the communication process with the supervisor as less effective. This is caused by several factors, such as difficulty meeting the supervisor, difficulty understanding the messages delivered, messages that are less informative and tend to force, as well as a lack of conducive atmosphere in the guidance process.

Deeper Analysis

Difficulty Factors of Meeting Supervisors

This factor can be overcome by improving communication and coordination between students and supervisors, such as setting flexible meeting schedules and using other communication media such as e-mail or instant messaging applications.

Difficulties in Understanding the Message

Supervisor lecturers need to pay attention to the style of communication and the use of language that is easily understood by students. Interactive delivery techniques and use of visual media can help clarify the messages conveyed.

Messages that are Less Informative and Tend to Force

Supervising lecturers need to provide clear, specific, and constructive direction. Giving space for students to convey ideas and questions is also important in building effective communication.

Lack of Conducive Atmosphere

Supervising lecturers can create a conducive atmosphere by being friendly, empathetic, and appreciative of student ideas. A positive and mutually supportive atmosphere can increase the effectiveness of communication in thesis guidance.

Suggestions and Recommendations

This study provides recommendations for related parties to increase the effectiveness of the communication process in thesis guidance, such as:

Improve Coordination and Communication

Supervisor and Student Lecturers need to make more intense coordination and communication to determine the schedule of meetings, convey important information, and solve problems that arise during the guidance process.

Effective Communication Training

Supervisors are expected to get training on effective communication techniques in the thesis guidance process. This will help lecturers in conveying information clearly, listening to student opinions, and building a conducive atmosphere.

Increasing the Role of the Institution

Higher Education Institutions need to support the improvement of the quality of thesis guidance by providing facilities and programs that support the effective communication process between the supervisor and students.

Conclusion

By increasing the effectiveness of communication in thesis guidance, students are expected to be able to complete the thesis more easily and the results of higher quality research. This study provides valuable insights into the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance and offers recommendations for related parties to improve the effectiveness of the communication process.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the study. Future studies can build on this study by exploring the communication process in thesis guidance in more depth and with a larger sample size.

Future Research Directions

Future research can explore the communication process in thesis guidance in more depth, including the role of technology in facilitating communication between students and supervisors. Additionally, future research can investigate the impact of effective communication in thesis guidance on student outcomes, such as thesis completion rates and research quality.

References

This study was conducted using a descriptive quantitative approach, and the data was analyzed using SPSS 16 software assistance. The results of this study are based on the perceptions of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance.

Appendices

The appendices include the questionnaire used in this study, the data analysis procedures, and the results of the data analysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance. The results of this study show that the communication process between students and supervisors is generally considered effective by students. However, there are still a small number of students who assess the communication process with the supervisor as less effective. This study provides recommendations for related parties to improve the effectiveness of the communication process in thesis guidance, including improving coordination and communication, providing effective communication training, and increasing the role of the institution.
Q&A: USU FISIP Communication Student Perception of the Communication Process in Thesis Guidance

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the results of a study on the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance. In this article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the study and its findings.

Q: What was the purpose of the study?

A: The purpose of the study was to describe the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance.

Q: Who was the population of the study?

A: The population of the study was all USU FISIP communication students who were actively working on their thesis and had completed their thesis in the period January 2012 to June 2013.

Q: What was the sample size of the study?

A: The sample size of the study was 61 students, selected using proportional sampling methods and simple random sampling.

Q: What were the main findings of the study?

A: The main findings of the study were that the communication process between students and supervisors was generally considered effective by students. Most students felt that the communication process in thesis guidance provided good motivation, knowledge, and direction. However, there were still a small number of students who assessed the communication process with the supervisor as less effective.

Q: What were the factors that contributed to the less effective communication process?

A: The factors that contributed to the less effective communication process were difficulty meeting the supervisor, difficulty understanding the messages delivered, messages that were less informative and tend to force, and a lack of conducive atmosphere in the guidance process.

Q: What are the recommendations for improving the communication process in thesis guidance?

A: The recommendations for improving the communication process in thesis guidance are:

Improve coordination and communication between students and supervisors
Provide effective communication training for supervisors
Increase the role of the institution in supporting the effective communication process between students and supervisors

Q: What are the implications of the study for students, supervisors, and institutions?

A: The implications of the study are that students, supervisors, and institutions need to work together to improve the communication process in thesis guidance. Students need to be more proactive in seeking help and communicating with their supervisors. Supervisors need to be more effective in communicating with their students and providing guidance. Institutions need to provide support and resources to help students and supervisors communicate effectively.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The limitations of the study are that the sample size was small and the study was limited to USU FISIP communication students. Future studies can build on this study by exploring the communication process in thesis guidance in more depth and with a larger sample size.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The future research directions are to explore the communication process in thesis guidance in more depth, including the role of technology in facilitating communication between students and supervisors. Additionally, future research can investigate the impact of effective communication in thesis guidance on student outcomes, such as thesis completion rates and research quality.

Q: What are the practical implications of the study for students and supervisors?

A: The practical implications of the study are that students and supervisors need to work together to improve the communication process in thesis guidance. Students need to be more proactive in seeking help and communicating with their supervisors. Supervisors need to be more effective in communicating with their students and providing guidance.

Q: What are the recommendations for future studies?

A: The recommendations for future studies are to explore the communication process in thesis guidance in more depth, including the role of technology in facilitating communication between students and supervisors. Additionally, future research can investigate the impact of effective communication in thesis guidance on student outcomes, such as thesis completion rates and research quality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this Q&A article provides answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about the study on the perception of USU FISIP communication students towards the communication process in thesis guidance. The study provides valuable insights into the communication process in thesis guidance and offers recommendations for improving the communication process.