Logistics Distribution Analysis In The 2019 Elections In Medan City

Feb 27, 2025 by ADMIN 68 views

Introduction

The 2019 elections in Medan City were marred by delays in logistics distribution, which resulted in 35% of polling stations (TPS) failing to start voting on time. This delay is a significant issue, as it violates Article 341 paragraph 6 of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, which states that voting equipment must be received by the Voting Organizing Group (KPPS) no later than one day before the voting day. This study aims to explore the 2019 election logistics distribution process conducted by the Medan KPU, identify obstacles that cause delays, and find solutions to increase election integrity.

Theoretical Framework

The election logistics distribution process not only involves technical aspects but also involves various relevant political theories. By using the theory of political institutions and election institutions, we can analyze the role of the KPU as an institution organizing elections. Furthermore, the theory of election integrity and election governance helps us understand the relationship between delays in logistics distribution and overall election integrity. In addition, the theory of logistics distribution and diamond porter functions to identify problems in distribution and find effective solutions.

The theory of political institutions and election institutions is essential in understanding the role of the KPU as an institution organizing elections. This theory helps us analyze the structure and function of the KPU, as well as its relationship with other institutions involved in the election process. The theory of election integrity and election governance is also crucial in understanding the relationship between delays in logistics distribution and overall election integrity. This theory helps us analyze the factors that contribute to election integrity, including the performance of election organizers, external factors such as money politics, and the overall electoral system.

Methodology

This study uses a qualitative approach to analyze the 2019 election logistics distribution process conducted by the Medan KPU. The data collection method used in this study is a case study, where the researcher collects data from various sources, including documents, interviews, and observations. The data analysis method used in this study is thematic analysis, where the researcher identifies and codes themes related to the research questions.

Results

The results of this study showed that there were a number of factors that caused the delay in the 2019 election logistics distribution in Medan. Some of the factors identified in this study include:

Stages of updating voter data (DPTHP): The process of updating voter data was not completed on time, which resulted in delays in logistics distribution.
Lack of transportation fleet: The KPU did not have enough transportation fleet to distribute logistics to all polling stations, which resulted in delays.
Distribution policies from PPS in Kelurahan to TPS: The distribution policies from PPS in Kelurahan to TPS were less efficient, which resulted in delays.

Discussion

The delay in logistics distribution not only reflects the existence of human errors but also shows the lack of capacity and ability of election organizers. Furthermore, election integrity is not only influenced by the organizer's performance but also by external factors such as the practice of money politics that can affect public trust in the election process.

The results of this study have several implications for election organizers and policymakers. Firstly, election organizers should ensure that the logistics distribution process is well-planned and executed to avoid delays. Secondly, election organizers should have a sufficient transportation fleet to distribute logistics to all polling stations. Thirdly, election organizers should review and improve their distribution policies to ensure that they are efficient and effective.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has identified several factors that caused the delay in the 2019 election logistics distribution in Medan. The study has also proposed several solutions to overcome these delays, including logistics distribution from the KPU directly to PPS and then to TPS, and the use of distribution centers or warehouses in five electoral districts in Medan. The success of logistics distribution is the key to ensuring fair, transparent, and high integrity elections.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Logistics distribution from the KPU directly to PPS and then to TPS: This will ensure a more structured distribution flow and minimize delays.
Use of distribution centers or warehouses in five electoral districts in Medan: This will help ease the distribution burden by breaking concentration in one place and allow the organizer to be more focused and efficient.
Review and improvement of distribution policies: This will ensure that the distribution policies are efficient and effective.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only analyzed the 2019 election logistics distribution process in Medan City, and the findings may not be generalizable to other cities or regions. Secondly, the study only used a qualitative approach, and the findings may not be representative of the entire population. Finally, the study only analyzed the logistics distribution process and did not consider other factors that may have contributed to the delay.

Future Research Directions

This study has several implications for future research. Firstly, future studies should investigate the logistics distribution process in other cities or regions to determine whether the findings of this study are generalizable. Secondly, future studies should use a mixed-methods approach to analyze the logistics distribution process and consider other factors that may have contributed to the delay. Finally, future studies should investigate the impact of logistics distribution on election integrity and overall electoral system.

References

Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.
Article 341 paragraph 6 of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.
Theory of political institutions and election institutions.
Theory of election integrity and election governance.
Theory of logistics distribution and diamond porter functions.

Appendix

List of interviewees.
List of documents analyzed.
List of observations made.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Logistics Distribution Analysis in the 2019 Elections in Medan City =============================================================================================

Q: What was the main issue with logistics distribution in the 2019 elections in Medan City?

A: The main issue with logistics distribution in the 2019 elections in Medan City was the delay in delivering voting equipment to polling stations, which resulted in 35% of polling stations failing to start voting on time.

Q: What were the causes of the delay in logistics distribution?

A: The causes of the delay in logistics distribution included:

Stages of updating voter data (DPTHP)
Lack of transportation fleet
Distribution policies from PPS in Kelurahan to TPS

Q: What are the implications of the delay in logistics distribution?

A: The delay in logistics distribution not only reflects the existence of human errors but also shows the lack of capacity and ability of election organizers. Furthermore, election integrity is not only influenced by the organizer's performance but also by external factors such as the practice of money politics that can affect public trust in the election process.

Q: What are the solutions proposed to overcome the delays in logistics distribution?

A: The solutions proposed to overcome the delays in logistics distribution include:

Logistics distribution from the KPU directly to PPS and then to TPS
Use of distribution centers or warehouses in five electoral districts in Medan
Review and improvement of distribution policies

Q: What are the benefits of implementing the proposed solutions?

A: The benefits of implementing the proposed solutions include:

Ensuring a more structured distribution flow and minimizing delays
Easing the distribution burden by breaking concentration in one place
Allowing the organizer to be more focused and efficient

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include:

The study only analyzed the 2019 election logistics distribution process in Medan City, and the findings may not be generalizable to other cities or regions.
The study only used a qualitative approach, and the findings may not be representative of the entire population.
The study only analyzed the logistics distribution process and did not consider other factors that may have contributed to the delay.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The future research directions include:

Investigating the logistics distribution process in other cities or regions to determine whether the findings of this study are generalizable.
Using a mixed-methods approach to analyze the logistics distribution process and consider other factors that may have contributed to the delay.
Investigating the impact of logistics distribution on election integrity and overall electoral system.

Q: What are the recommendations for election organizers and policymakers?

A: The recommendations for election organizers and policymakers include:

Ensuring that the logistics distribution process is well-planned and executed to avoid delays.
Having a sufficient transportation fleet to distribute logistics to all polling stations.
Reviewing and improving distribution policies to ensure that they are efficient and effective.

Q: What are the implications of this study for election integrity and overall electoral system?

A: The implications of this study for election integrity and overall electoral system include:

Ensuring that the logistics distribution process is transparent and accountable.
Ensuring that the logistics distribution process is efficient and effective.
Ensuring that the logistics distribution process does not compromise the integrity of the electoral system.