Juridical Analysis The Implementation Of Decent And Fair Compensation In Land Acquisition For Development For Public Interest In Langsa City (Comparative Study Of The Supreme Court Decision Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 1551.K/PDT/2021 And Number 1396.K/PDT/2021)

by ADMIN 270 views

Juridical Analysis The Implementation of Decent and Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest in Langsa City

Introduction

In an effort to improve infrastructure for the public interest, the Langsa City Government through the Public Works and Spatial Planning Office (PUPR) conducted land acquisition for the expansion of Karang Anyer-Gang Kurnia Road in Langsa Baro District in 2020. The land acquisition process involved the acquisition of Business Use Rights (HGU) owned by PT Perkebunan Nusantara I. However, during the deliberation process regarding the form and value of compensation, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I rejected the compensation value offered by the Land Procurement Organizing Committee. The company argued that the proposed land value was lower compared to the value of neighboring land and was also lower than the 2020 Tax Object Sales Value (NJOP). This article aims to analyze the implementation of the determination of appropriate and fair compensation values in accordance with applicable regulations and discuss legal efforts that can be taken by land rights holders who do not agree with the assessment that is considered not to meet the element of "adequate and fair compensation".

Research Approach

This study uses a normative or normative juridical law approach with a descriptive analysis of research. The data used as the basis of analysis is secondary data, which is collected through the library data collection method. Analysis is carried out with a qualitative approach, where researchers explore and evaluate applicable norms and how it is applied in this case of land acquisition.

The Process of Determining the Value of Compensation

Determination of the value of equal loss in land acquisition for public development is carried out based on applicable provisions, namely through an assessment by an appraiser. According to guidelines, as contained in Kepi and SPI, especially SPI: 204, the appraiser is tasked with getting a fair replacement value (fair replacement value). The results of this assessment then become the basis for the implementation of deliberations regarding the form and amount of compensation agreed by the entitled parties.

If there is no agreement, the entitled party can submit an objection to the local District Court. The decision of the District Court cannot be appealed, but can be submitted to the Supreme Court. The cassation decision is final and binding, so there is no opportunity for a review.

Judge's Consideration in the Decision

In analyzing the differences in judges' considerations in the two Supreme Court decisions, there are several aspects that need attention. In decision number 1551.K/Pdt/2021, the judge considering the evidence that indicates that the compensation offered clearly does not meet the justice standards for landowners, while in Decision Number 1396.K/Pdt/2021, the judge prioritizes administrative aspects and decides that the value offered by the committee is in accordance with applicable regulations.

This difference reflects the challenges in balancing public interests and individual rights. Supposedly, in the process of land acquisition, the value of equitable compensation is not only determined based on the count of numbers but also pays attention to the emotional and social values of the land taken, so that it does not only benefit one party.

The Role of the Supreme Court in Land Acquisition Cases

The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in land acquisition cases, as it has the final say in determining the value of compensation. In the two decisions analyzed in this article, the Supreme Court considered different aspects of the case, highlighting the complexity of land acquisition cases. The Supreme Court's decision in these cases sets a precedent for future land acquisition cases, emphasizing the importance of balancing public interests and individual rights.

Conclusion

The implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development in the city of Langsa faces complex challenges. The process of determining the value of compensation needs to be done carefully and transparently, as well as involving the parties concerned. Parties who feel disadvantaged have the right to demand justice through the legal channels that have been provided. Thus, it is expected that the implementation of land acquisition not only prioritizes development for the public interest, but also respects individual rights fairly and equitably.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis of the two Supreme Court decisions, the following recommendations can be made:

  1. Transparency in the land acquisition process: The land acquisition process should be transparent, involving all parties concerned, including the land rights holders, the government, and the public.
  2. Fair compensation: The value of compensation should be determined fairly, taking into account the emotional and social values of the land taken, as well as the economic value of the land.
  3. Balancing public interests and individual rights: The land acquisition process should balance public interests and individual rights, ensuring that the rights of land rights holders are respected and protected.
  4. Supreme Court's role in land acquisition cases: The Supreme Court should play a crucial role in land acquisition cases, ensuring that the value of compensation is determined fairly and in accordance with applicable regulations.

Future Research Directions

This study highlights the importance of analyzing the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development. Future research directions can include:

  1. Comparative study of land acquisition cases: A comparative study of land acquisition cases in different cities or regions can provide valuable insights into the challenges and best practices in land acquisition.
  2. Analysis of the impact of land acquisition on local communities: An analysis of the impact of land acquisition on local communities can provide valuable insights into the social and economic effects of land acquisition.
  3. Development of a framework for fair compensation: The development of a framework for fair compensation can provide a clear and transparent process for determining the value of compensation in land acquisition cases.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

  1. Limited data: The study is based on secondary data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date.
  2. Limited scope: The study focuses on land acquisition cases in Langsa City, which may not be representative of land acquisition cases in other cities or regions.
  3. Limited analysis: The study only analyzes two Supreme Court decisions, which may not be representative of all land acquisition cases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of analyzing the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development. The study emphasizes the need for transparency, fairness, and balance in the land acquisition process, as well as the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring that the value of compensation is determined fairly and in accordance with applicable regulations. Future research directions can include comparative studies of land acquisition cases, analysis of the impact of land acquisition on local communities, and the development of a framework for fair compensation.
Q&A: Juridical Analysis The Implementation of Decent and Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest in Langsa City

Introduction

In our previous article, we analyzed the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development in Langsa City. We discussed the challenges faced by land rights holders in determining the value of compensation and the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring that the value of compensation is determined fairly and in accordance with applicable regulations. In this article, we will answer some of the frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development.

Q: What is the purpose of the land acquisition process?

A: The purpose of the land acquisition process is to acquire land for public development, such as infrastructure projects, housing projects, and other development projects that benefit the public interest.

Q: Who is responsible for determining the value of compensation?

A: The value of compensation is determined by an appraiser, who is tasked with getting a fair replacement value (fair replacement value) of the land taken.

Q: What are the factors that are considered in determining the value of compensation?

A: The factors that are considered in determining the value of compensation include the economic value of the land, the emotional and social values of the land, and the impact of the land acquisition on the local community.

Q: Can land rights holders object to the value of compensation offered by the government?

A: Yes, land rights holders can object to the value of compensation offered by the government. They can submit an objection to the local District Court, which will then review the case and make a decision.

Q: Can the decision of the District Court be appealed?

A: No, the decision of the District Court cannot be appealed. However, the decision can be submitted to the Supreme Court for review.

Q: What is the role of the Supreme Court in land acquisition cases?

A: The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in land acquisition cases, as it has the final say in determining the value of compensation. The Supreme Court's decision is final and binding, and it sets a precedent for future land acquisition cases.

Q: What are the challenges faced by land rights holders in determining the value of compensation?

A: The challenges faced by land rights holders in determining the value of compensation include the lack of transparency in the land acquisition process, the lack of fairness in the determination of the value of compensation, and the impact of the land acquisition on the local community.

Q: What are the benefits of fair compensation in land acquisition?

A: The benefits of fair compensation in land acquisition include the promotion of transparency and fairness in the land acquisition process, the protection of the rights of land rights holders, and the promotion of social and economic development in the local community.

Q: What are the consequences of unfair compensation in land acquisition?

A: The consequences of unfair compensation in land acquisition include the loss of trust in the government, the loss of confidence in the land acquisition process, and the promotion of social and economic unrest in the local community.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the factors involved. Land rights holders have the right to object to the value of compensation offered by the government, and the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in ensuring that the value of compensation is determined fairly and in accordance with applicable regulations. We hope that this Q&A article has provided valuable insights into the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis of the FAQs, the following recommendations can be made:

  1. Transparency in the land acquisition process: The land acquisition process should be transparent, involving all parties concerned, including the land rights holders, the government, and the public.
  2. Fair compensation: The value of compensation should be determined fairly, taking into account the emotional and social values of the land taken, as well as the economic value of the land.
  3. Protection of the rights of land rights holders: The rights of land rights holders should be protected, including their right to object to the value of compensation offered by the government.
  4. Promotion of social and economic development: The land acquisition process should promote social and economic development in the local community, including the creation of jobs and the provision of infrastructure.

Future Research Directions

This Q&A article highlights the importance of analyzing the implementation of decent and fair compensation in land acquisition for development. Future research directions can include:

  1. Comparative study of land acquisition cases: A comparative study of land acquisition cases in different cities or regions can provide valuable insights into the challenges and best practices in land acquisition.
  2. Analysis of the impact of land acquisition on local communities: An analysis of the impact of land acquisition on local communities can provide valuable insights into the social and economic effects of land acquisition.
  3. Development of a framework for fair compensation: The development of a framework for fair compensation can provide a clear and transparent process for determining the value of compensation in land acquisition cases.