Is It Possible To Not Map Existing Geometries? (new Geom Based Workflow)

by ADMIN 73 views

Problem Description

When creating a new project, users often encounter a scenario where there is no existing data in the area they are interested in mapping. This is particularly common when users choose not to map in OpenStreetMap (OSM), as OSM typically has some level of data coverage. In such cases, the current workflow can be restrictive, as project creation is blocked due to the absence of existing data. This limitation can hinder the user's ability to proceed with their mapping project.

The Need for a New Workflow

To address this issue, a new workflow is proposed that allows users to start with no existing data and focus on creating new geometries. This approach would provide users with more flexibility and control over their mapping projects, especially in areas where there is a lack of existing data. By offering an option to start with no data, users can bypass the current restrictions and begin their project creation process without any obstacles.

Proposed Solution

To implement this new workflow, an option should be added to the 'Map Data' tab during project creation. This option would allow users to select 'start with no data (new geometries only)'. This simple yet effective change would enable users to create new projects without being hindered by the absence of existing data.

Handling Splitting in the New Workflow

Another important consideration for this new workflow is how to handle splitting. In the current workflow, splitting is often handled by using the project area as a single task area by default. While this approach is not ideal, as it requires users to click on the project area for popups, it works for now. However, as we move forward with the new workflow, it would be beneficial to explore more efficient and user-friendly solutions for handling splitting.

Benefits of the New Workflow

The proposed new workflow offers several benefits, including:

  • Increased flexibility: Users can now create new projects without being restricted by the absence of existing data.
  • Improved user experience: The new workflow would provide users with a more streamlined and efficient experience, allowing them to focus on creating new geometries without any obstacles.
  • Enhanced mapping capabilities: By enabling users to start with no data, the new workflow would open up new possibilities for mapping and data creation.

Implementation Considerations

To implement the new workflow, several considerations should be taken into account:

  • User interface: The 'Map Data' tab should be updated to include the new option for starting with no data.
  • Project creation process: The project creation process should be modified to accommodate the new workflow, ensuring that users can select the 'start with no data' option and proceed with their project creation.
  • Splitting handling: A more efficient and user-friendly solution for handling splitting should be explored and implemented.

Conclusion

The proposed new workflow for creating new geometries without mapping existing data offers several benefits, including increased flexibility, improved user experience, and enhanced mapping capabilities. By adding an option to the 'Map Data' tab and modifying the project creation process, users can now create new projects without being restricted by the absence of existing data. As we move forward with the implementation of this new workflow, it is essential to consider the user interface, project creation process, and splitting handling to ensure a seamless and efficient experience for users.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main issue with the current workflow?

A: The main issue with the current workflow is that it restricts users from creating new projects when there is no existing data in the area they are interested in mapping. This can hinder the user's ability to proceed with their mapping project.

Q: Why is it necessary to have a new workflow?

A: A new workflow is necessary to provide users with more flexibility and control over their mapping projects, especially in areas where there is a lack of existing data. By offering an option to start with no data, users can bypass the current restrictions and begin their project creation process without any obstacles.

Q: How would the new workflow work?

A: The new workflow would involve adding an option to the 'Map Data' tab during project creation, allowing users to select 'start with no data (new geometries only)'. This simple yet effective change would enable users to create new projects without being hindered by the absence of existing data.

Q: What about splitting in the new workflow?

A: Splitting in the new workflow would likely be handled by using the project area as a single task area by default. However, a more efficient and user-friendly solution for handling splitting should be explored and implemented.

Q: What are the benefits of the new workflow?

A: The proposed new workflow offers several benefits, including:

  • Increased flexibility: Users can now create new projects without being restricted by the absence of existing data.
  • Improved user experience: The new workflow would provide users with a more streamlined and efficient experience, allowing them to focus on creating new geometries without any obstacles.
  • Enhanced mapping capabilities: By enabling users to start with no data, the new workflow would open up new possibilities for mapping and data creation.

Q: How would the new workflow be implemented?

A: To implement the new workflow, several considerations should be taken into account:

  • User interface: The 'Map Data' tab should be updated to include the new option for starting with no data.
  • Project creation process: The project creation process should be modified to accommodate the new workflow, ensuring that users can select the 'start with no data' option and proceed with their project creation.
  • Splitting handling: A more efficient and user-friendly solution for handling splitting should be explored and implemented.

Q: What are the potential challenges with the new workflow?

A: Some potential challenges with the new workflow include:

  • User confusion: Users may be confused by the new option and how it affects the project creation process.
  • Data consistency: Ensuring that the new workflow does not compromise data consistency and accuracy.
  • System performance: The new workflow may require modifications to the system's performance and scalability.

Q: How would the new workflow be tested and validated?

A: The new workflow would be tested and validated through a combination of user testing, system testing, and quality assurance processes. This would ensure that the new workflow meets the required standards and is free from defects.

Q: What is the expected timeline for implementing the new workflow?

A: The expected timeline for implementing the new workflow would depend on various factors, including the complexity of the changes, the availability of resources, and the priority of the project. However, it is expected that the new workflow would be implemented within the next 6-12 months.