In The Lovaas (1987) Study, What Was The Criteria For The Best Outcome?A. IQ, School Placement, And Diagnosis B. IQ, School Placement, And Funding C. School Placement, Diagnosis, And Parents Reporting D. School Placement, Parent Reporting, And

by ADMIN 247 views

The Lovaas (1987) study, conducted by Ivar Lovaas, is a landmark research in the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and autism treatment. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) in children with autism. In this article, we will delve into the criteria used to determine the best outcome in the Lovaas (1987) study.

Background on the Lovaas (1987) Study

The Lovaas (1987) study was a pioneering research that laid the foundation for the development of ABA-based interventions for individuals with autism. The study involved 19 children with autism who received intensive behavioral treatment, and 19 children who received no treatment. The results of the study showed that the children who received intensive behavioral treatment made significant gains in their cognitive, social, and adaptive skills.

Criteria for Best Outcome

The Lovaas (1987) study used a combination of criteria to determine the best outcome for the children who received intensive behavioral treatment. The criteria included:

  • IQ: The study used IQ scores as one of the criteria to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment showed significant gains in their IQ scores, with an average increase of 20 points.
  • School Placement: The study also used school placement as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment were more likely to be placed in regular classrooms, whereas the children who received no treatment were more likely to be placed in special education classrooms.
  • Diagnosis: The study used diagnosis as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment showed significant gains in their adaptive skills, and were less likely to be diagnosed with autism.
  • Funding: The study used funding as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment were more likely to receive funding for their treatment, whereas the children who received no treatment were less likely to receive funding.

However, the correct answer is not listed above. The correct answer is actually C. School placement, diagnosis, and parents reporting. This is because the study used a combination of these criteria to determine the best outcome, including:

  • School placement: The study used school placement as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment were more likely to be placed in regular classrooms, whereas the children who received no treatment were more likely to be placed in special education classrooms.
  • Diagnosis: The study used diagnosis as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The children who received intensive behavioral treatment showed significant gains in their adaptive skills, and were less likely to be diagnosed with autism.
  • Parents reporting: The study used parents' reports as a criterion to determine the best outcome. The parents of the children who received intensive behavioral treatment reported significant gains in their children's behavior and adaptive skills.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Lovaas (1987) study used a combination of criteria to determine the best outcome for the children who received intensive behavioral treatment. The criteria included school placement, diagnosis, and parents reporting. The study showed that the children who received intensive behavioral treatment made significant gains in their cognitive, social, and adaptive skills, and were more likely to be placed in regular classrooms and less likely to be diagnosed with autism.

References

Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 3-9.

Discussion

The Lovaas (1987) study has had a significant impact on the field of autism treatment. The study showed that early intensive behavioral intervention can lead to significant gains in cognitive, social, and adaptive skills in children with autism. The study's findings have been replicated in numerous subsequent studies, and have led to the development of ABA-based interventions for individuals with autism.

However, the study has also been criticized for its methodological limitations. Some critics have argued that the study's sample size was too small, and that the study's results may not be generalizable to other populations. Others have argued that the study's criteria for determining the best outcome were too narrow, and that other criteria, such as social and emotional functioning, should have been included.

Despite these limitations, the Lovaas (1987) study remains an important contribution to the field of autism treatment. The study's findings have had a significant impact on the development of ABA-based interventions, and have led to improved outcomes for individuals with autism.

Social Studies

The Lovaas (1987) study has implications for social studies in several ways. The study highlights the importance of early intervention in autism treatment, and the need for policymakers to invest in evidence-based interventions. The study also highlights the importance of parent involvement in autism treatment, and the need for policymakers to support parents in their efforts to advocate for their children.

In addition, the study has implications for social studies in terms of the need for increased funding for autism research and treatment. The study's findings have shown that early intensive behavioral intervention can lead to significant gains in cognitive, social, and adaptive skills in children with autism, but this type of intervention is often expensive and may not be accessible to all families.

The Lovaas (1987) study is a landmark research in the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and autism treatment. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) in children with autism. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions about the Lovaas (1987) study and autism treatment.

Q: What was the main goal of the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: The main goal of the Lovaas (1987) study was to investigate the effectiveness of early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) in children with autism. The study aimed to determine whether EIBI could lead to significant gains in cognitive, social, and adaptive skills in children with autism.

Q: What was the sample size of the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: The sample size of the Lovaas (1987) study was 19 children with autism who received intensive behavioral treatment, and 19 children who received no treatment.

Q: What were the criteria used to determine the best outcome in the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: The criteria used to determine the best outcome in the Lovaas (1987) study included school placement, diagnosis, and parents reporting. The study showed that the children who received intensive behavioral treatment made significant gains in their cognitive, social, and adaptive skills, and were more likely to be placed in regular classrooms and less likely to be diagnosed with autism.

Q: What were the results of the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: The results of the Lovaas (1987) study showed that the children who received intensive behavioral treatment made significant gains in their cognitive, social, and adaptive skills. The study also showed that the children who received intensive behavioral treatment were more likely to be placed in regular classrooms and less likely to be diagnosed with autism.

Q: What are the implications of the Lovaas (1987) study for autism treatment?

A: The Lovaas (1987) study has had a significant impact on the field of autism treatment. The study's findings have shown that early intensive behavioral intervention can lead to significant gains in cognitive, social, and adaptive skills in children with autism. The study's findings have also highlighted the importance of early intervention and parent involvement in autism treatment.

Q: What are some of the limitations of the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: Some of the limitations of the Lovaas (1987) study include its small sample size and the fact that the study's results may not be generalizable to other populations. Additionally, the study's criteria for determining the best outcome were too narrow, and other criteria, such as social and emotional functioning, should have been included.

Q: What are some of the implications of the Lovaas (1987) study for social studies?

A: The Lovaas (1987) study has implications for social studies in several ways. The study highlights the importance of early intervention in autism treatment, and the need for policymakers to invest in evidence-based interventions. The study also highlights the importance of parent involvement in autism treatment, and the need for policymakers to support parents in their efforts to advocate for their children.

Q: What are some of the recommendations for future research based on the Lovaas (1987) study?

A: Some of the recommendations for future research based on the Lovaas (1987) study include:

  • Conducting larger-scale studies to replicate the findings of the Lovaas (1987) study
  • Investigating the effectiveness of EIBI in children with autism who have more severe symptoms
  • Examining the long-term outcomes of children who received EIBI in the Lovaas (1987) study
  • Investigating the role of parent involvement in EIBI and its impact on treatment outcomes

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Lovaas (1987) study is a landmark research in the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) and autism treatment. The study's findings have shown that early intensive behavioral intervention can lead to significant gains in cognitive, social, and adaptive skills in children with autism. The study's implications for social studies highlight the importance of early intervention and parent involvement in autism treatment.