Implementation Of The Rehabilitation And Reconstruction Program After The Earthquake Disaster In Central Aceh Regency

Implementation of the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program after the Earthquake Disaster in Central Aceh Regency

Introduction

On July 2, 2013, a devastating earthquake with a magnitude of 6.2 on the Richter scale struck Aceh Province, particularly in Ketol District, Central Aceh Regency. The impact of the earthquake was catastrophic, resulting in significant damage to public facilities and infrastructure, including roads, residents' homes, school buildings, puskesmas, irrigation networks, and houses of worship. In addition to the destruction, the earthquake claimed lives in two districts, namely Central Aceh and Bener Meriah. In response to this disaster, the Government of Aceh declared a state of disaster based on Law No. 24 of 2007 through Governor Decree Number 360/571/2013. This decision outlined the phases of disaster management, including emergency response and the implementation of rehabilitation and reconstruction.

The implementation of rehabilitation and reconstruction activities was assigned to the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), which then coordinated with the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) to compile guidelines and direction in the implementation of rehabilitation and reconstruction in a fair and equivalent manner. The Government of Aceh's response to the disaster was a crucial step in mitigating the impact of the earthquake and ensuring the well-being of affected communities.

Methodology

This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach to examine the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program after the earthquake disaster in Central Aceh Regency. Primary data collection techniques were conducted through in-depth interviews with key informants, including Central Aceh Regency BPBD employees, as well as interviews with disaster-affected communities. Observation and secondary data collection were also carried out to support the results of the research.

The research aimed to provide an in-depth understanding of the challenges faced by the government and related stakeholders in implementing the rehabilitation and reconstruction program. The study's findings highlighted the importance of addressing the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program.

Results

The results of the study showed that the stages of the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program were in accordance with the technical instructions listed in Law No. 24 of 2007 and Perka BNPB No. 3 of 2013. However, the implementation of the program has not been running optimally. One of the main challenges faced is the insufficient funding allocation to improve and reconstruct people's homes affected by the disaster.

The study's findings emphasized the need for the government to find alternative funding sources, both through international donations, cooperation with private institutions, as well as CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) programs of large companies. Transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community is also crucial to build public trust. With openness, the community will believe that the assistance and funds allocated are used according to their needs.

Analysis of Challenges and Solutions

The challenges in the implementation of this rehabilitation and reconstruction program are significant issues that need to be considered by the government and related stakeholders. The minimal allocation of funds not only hinders infrastructure improvement but also has an impact on the psychological recovery of people who lose their residences and assets. Therefore, it is essential for the government to find alternative funding sources to support the implementation of the program.

In addition to addressing the funding challenges, the government must also prioritize transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community. This will help build public trust and ensure that the assistance and funds allocated are used according to the needs of the affected communities.

Conclusion

The implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program after the earthquake disaster in Central Aceh Regency requires the attention and joint efforts of various parties. With the right strategy and good collaboration, it is hoped that the recovery process can run more effectively and have a positive impact on affected people.

The study's findings highlighted the importance of addressing the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program. The government and related stakeholders must work together to find alternative funding sources, prioritize transparency in managing funds, and provide counseling to affected communities regarding the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction.

Recommendations

Based on the study's findings, the following recommendations are made:

1. The government must find alternative funding sources to support the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program.
2. Transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community must be prioritized to build public trust.
3. Counseling regarding the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction must be provided to affected communities to ensure that they understand the stages and obstacles encountered.
4. The government and related stakeholders must work together to address the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program.

By implementing these recommendations, it is hoped that the recovery process can run more effectively and have a positive impact on affected people.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Implementation of the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program after the Earthquake Disaster in Central Aceh Regency

Q: What was the impact of the earthquake on the infrastructure and public facilities in Central Aceh Regency?

A: The earthquake had a significant impact on the infrastructure and public facilities in Central Aceh Regency, resulting in damage to roads, residents' homes, school buildings, puskesmas, irrigation networks, and houses of worship.

Q: What was the role of the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) in the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program?

A: The BNPB played a crucial role in the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program, coordinating with the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) to compile guidelines and direction in the implementation of rehabilitation and reconstruction in a fair and equivalent manner.

Q: What were the challenges faced by the government and related stakeholders in implementing the rehabilitation and reconstruction program?

A: The main challenges faced by the government and related stakeholders in implementing the rehabilitation and reconstruction program were the insufficient funding allocation to improve and reconstruct people's homes affected by the disaster, as well as the need for transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community.

Q: What are the recommendations for addressing the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program?

A: The recommendations for addressing the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program include finding alternative funding sources, prioritizing transparency in managing funds, and providing counseling to affected communities regarding the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction.

Q: What is the importance of transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community?

A: Transparency in managing funds and reporting to the community is crucial in building public trust and ensuring that the assistance and funds allocated are used according to the needs of the affected communities.

Q: What is the role of counseling in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process?

A: Counseling plays a vital role in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process, as it helps affected communities understand the stages and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program.

Q: What are the benefits of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program for affected communities?

A: The benefits of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program for affected communities include the improvement and reconstruction of their homes, infrastructure, and public facilities, as well as the provision of counseling and support to help them recover from the disaster.

Q: What is the expected outcome of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program?

A: The expected outcome of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program is a more effective and sustainable recovery process that has a positive impact on affected communities.

Q: What is the role of the government and related stakeholders in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process?

A: The government and related stakeholders play a crucial role in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process, working together to address the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program and ensuring that the assistance and funds allocated are used according to the needs of the affected communities.

Q: What are the lessons learned from the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program?

A: The lessons learned from the implementation of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program include the importance of transparency in managing funds, the need for alternative funding sources, and the importance of counseling and support for affected communities.

Q: What is the way forward for the rehabilitation and reconstruction program?

A: The way forward for the rehabilitation and reconstruction program is to continue working together to address the challenges and obstacles encountered during the implementation of the program, and to ensure that the assistance and funds allocated are used according to the needs of the affected communities.