Discourse Battle In The News Of Anas Urbaningrum Vs Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono In Kompas Daily

by ADMIN 93 views

Introduction

In the world of Indonesian politics, the battle between Anas Urbaningrum and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) became the main focus, especially in the news in Kompas Daily. This study was entitled "Discourse Fighting in the news of Anas Urbaningrum vs Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in Kompas Daily". The main focus of this research is to analyze the contents of media texts with a qualitative approach and critical paradigm. The purpose of this study is to understand how conflicts between Anas and SBY are presented and how the media ideology is reflected in these news.

Background

The study was conducted by analyzing the data from Kompas daily published between February 5, 2013 to January 17, 2014, consisting of eight relevant news. The analysis method used is the analysis of the discourse of theo van leeuwen model which focuses on two important processes: Exclusion (Exclusion) and Inclusion. The expenditure process refers to actors or groups that are not displayed in the news, while the income process is related to the way each party is introduced in the news and strategies used.

Methodology

The analysis of the discourse of theo van leeuwen model was used to analyze the data. This model focuses on two important processes: Exclusion (Exclusion) and Inclusion. The expenditure process refers to actors or groups that are not displayed in the news, while the income process is related to the way each party is introduced in the news and strategies used.

Results

The results of the analysis showed that Kompas daily reports tend to be balanced in presenting conflicts between Anas and SBY. This balance is reflected through the election of speakers which includes the opinion of both parties. However, there are also situations where both parties are marginalized or supported based on the issue raised.

Case Study 1: SBY Marginalized in the Context of the Issue of the Democratic Party Takeover

In the context of the issue of the Democratic Party takeover, SBY is marginalized in the news. This is reflected in the way the news is presented, where SBY is often described as a political parody with a predetermined winner. However, SBY also received support when the news was related to the removal of Anas's loyalist from the DPR faction and equipment.

Case Study 2: Anas Urbaningrum Marginalized Related to the Problem of Alleged Corruption

Conversely, Anas Urbaningrum is marginalized related to the problem of alleged corruption. In many reports, he was described trying to build an image as a victim in the internal conflict of the Democratic Party. However, Anas received protection in the context of the issue of the Democratic Party takeover, where his image as a figure who was still strong in the party was put forward, as well as the hope for reconciliation in the Democratic Party.

Discussion

This analysis provides in-depth insights on how the media play a role in forming political narratives and how discourse in reporting can affect public perception of political figures. With a critical approach, this research invites us to be more sensitive to how the news is compiled and its impact on the views of the community. Through a balanced news, Kompas daily seeks to maintain objectivity, but still does not avoid the influence of ideology and existing political communication strategies.

Conclusion

Understanding of discourse in the media is very important to interpret political dynamics in Indonesia. The study of discourse in the news of Anas Urbaningrum vs Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in Kompas Daily provides valuable insights on how the media can shape public perception of political figures and how discourse in reporting can affect the views of the community.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  • The media should be more sensitive to how the news is compiled and its impact on the views of the community.
  • The media should strive to maintain objectivity in reporting, but still avoid the influence of ideology and existing political communication strategies.
  • The media should provide more balanced reporting, including the opinion of both parties in conflicts.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only analyzed the data from Kompas daily published between February 5, 2013 to January 17, 2014. Secondly, the study only focused on the discourse of theo van leeuwen model. Finally, the study only analyzed the data from one newspaper, Kompas daily.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

  • Analyzing the discourse of other newspapers in Indonesia.
  • Analyzing the discourse of other political figures in Indonesia.
  • Analyzing the impact of discourse in reporting on public perception of political figures.

References

  • Theo van leeuwen. (1995). Discourse and Practice: From Sociology to Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Norman Fairclough. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
  • Teun A. van Dijk. (1993). Elite Discourse and Racism. Sage Publications.
    Q&A: Discourse Battle in the News of Anas Urbaningrum vs Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in Kompas Daily =============================================================================================

Q: What is the main focus of this research?

A: The main focus of this research is to analyze the contents of media texts with a qualitative approach and critical paradigm. The purpose of this study is to understand how conflicts between Anas and SBY are presented and how the media ideology is reflected in these news.

Q: What is the analysis method used in this study?

A: The analysis method used in this study is the analysis of the discourse of theo van leeuwen model which focuses on two important processes: Exclusion (Exclusion) and Inclusion. The expenditure process refers to actors or groups that are not displayed in the news, while the income process is related to the way each party is introduced in the news and strategies used.

Q: What are the results of the analysis?

A: The results of the analysis showed that Kompas daily reports tend to be balanced in presenting conflicts between Anas and SBY. This balance is reflected through the election of speakers which includes the opinion of both parties. However, there are also situations where both parties are marginalized or supported based on the issue raised.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: This analysis provides in-depth insights on how the media play a role in forming political narratives and how discourse in reporting can affect public perception of political figures. With a critical approach, this research invites us to be more sensitive to how the news is compiled and its impact on the views of the community.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only analyzed the data from Kompas daily published between February 5, 2013 to January 17, 2014. Secondly, the study only focused on the discourse of theo van leeuwen model. Finally, the study only analyzed the data from one newspaper, Kompas daily.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research directions include:

  • Analyzing the discourse of other newspapers in Indonesia.
  • Analyzing the discourse of other political figures in Indonesia.
  • Analyzing the impact of discourse in reporting on public perception of political figures.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  • The media should be more sensitive to how the news is compiled and its impact on the views of the community.
  • The media should strive to maintain objectivity in reporting, but still avoid the influence of ideology and existing political communication strategies.
  • The media should provide more balanced reporting, including the opinion of both parties in conflicts.

Q: What are the references used in this study?

A: The references used in this study include:

  • Theo van leeuwen. (1995). Discourse and Practice: From Sociology to Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Norman Fairclough. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
  • Teun A. van Dijk. (1993). Elite Discourse and Racism. Sage Publications.

Q: What is the conclusion of this study?

A: Understanding of discourse in the media is very important to interpret political dynamics in Indonesia. The study of discourse in the news of Anas Urbaningrum vs Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in Kompas Daily provides valuable insights on how the media can shape public perception of political figures and how discourse in reporting can affect the views of the community.