Differences In The Pattern Of Tongueprint Between The Batak And Chinese Ethnicity Based On The Classification Of Stefanescu At The Faculty Of Dentistry, University Of North Sumatra
Differences in the Pattern of Tongueprint between the Batak and Chinese Ethnicity based on the Classification of Stefanescu at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatra
The tongue is a vital organ in the human body that exhibits a wide range of shapes, gaps, textures, and tongue patterns. These variations are influenced by different genetic factors in each individual, depending on their sex and ethnicity. The uniqueness of the tongueprint makes it a valuable biometric tool, protected from external environmental influences due to its location in the oral cavity. Understanding the differences in tongueprint patterns between various ethnic groups can provide valuable insights into biometric variations in Indonesian society.
Research Purpose and Methodology
This study aims to determine and analyze the differences in the pattern of tongueprint between the Batak and Chinese ethnicity, focusing on aspects of shape, gap, texture, and tip of the tongue among students of the Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatra. The method used is descriptive-analytic research with a cross-sectional cut design. The research sample consisted of 30 Batak ethnic people (15 women and 15 men) and 30 Chinese ethnic people (15 women and 15 men).
The data collection process involved printing the tongue using alginate material (hydrocolloid is not reversed), then filling with type IV material, and taking digital photos using a professional camera. The tongueprint pattern data was analyzed based on the classification of Stefanescu and presented in the form of percentage and table. Statistical testing was carried out using the Chi-Square (X²) test to test the significance of differences.
Research Results
The results showed that there were significant variations in tongue fingerprints between the Batak and Chinese ethnic groups. For the Batak ethnic, the most common tongueprint pattern in women based on form is V-Shape (53.3%), with visible gaps (80.0%), physiological texture (100%), and the tip of the tongue is pointed (80.0%). As for Batak men, the most common patterns are U-Shape (46.7%), gaps are visible (80.0%), physiological texture (100%), and pointed tongue (73.3%).
On the other hand, for ethnic Chinese, the most common tongueprint pattern in women is ovoid (60.0%), with visible gaps (86.7%), physiological texture (100%), and the tip of a pointed tongue (73.3%). In Chinese men, the most common patterns are ovoid (53.3%), gaps are visible (93.3%), physiological texture (100%), and pointed tongue (80.0%).
Conclusion
Based on the analysis conducted, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference in the pattern of tongueprint between the two sexes in the Batak and Chinese ethnic groups. However, there are significant differences in the pattern of tongueprint between the Batak and Chinese ethnic groups, especially in the aspects of the tongue form (p-value = 0.022 < 0.050). This finding can contribute to further understanding of biometric variations in Indonesian society, and can be used as a reference in the fields of dentistry and health.
The significance of this study lies in its contribution to the understanding of biometric variations in Indonesian society, and its potential applications in the fields of dentistry and health. Through this research, it is hoped that the community and academics are more familiar with the importance of biometric studies and can explore other potentials that can be obtained from the analysis of tongue patterns in a broader ethnic context.
Implications of the Study
The findings of this study have several implications for the fields of dentistry and health. Firstly, the study highlights the importance of considering ethnic differences in biometric studies. The significant differences in tongueprint patterns between the Batak and Chinese ethnic groups suggest that ethnic differences should be taken into account when developing biometric systems.
Secondly, the study demonstrates the potential of tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool. The unique patterns of tongueprints make them a valuable tool for identification and authentication purposes. The study's findings can contribute to the development of more accurate and reliable biometric systems.
Thirdly, the study highlights the need for further research on biometric variations in Indonesian society. The study's findings suggest that there are significant differences in tongueprint patterns between various ethnic groups in Indonesia. Further research is needed to explore these differences and to develop a more comprehensive understanding of biometric variations in Indonesian society.
Limitations of the Study
The study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study's sample size is relatively small, consisting of only 30 Batak ethnic people and 30 Chinese ethnic people. A larger sample size would be needed to confirm the study's findings and to generalize the results to the broader population.
Secondly, the study's data collection method is limited to printing the tongue using alginate material. Other methods, such as digital tongueprint analysis, may provide more accurate and reliable results.
Thirdly, the study's analysis is limited to the classification of Stefanescu. Other classification systems may provide more detailed and nuanced insights into tongueprint patterns.
Future Directions
The study's findings suggest several future directions for research. Firstly, further research is needed to explore the differences in tongueprint patterns between various ethnic groups in Indonesia. A larger sample size and more diverse population would be needed to confirm the study's findings and to generalize the results to the broader population.
Secondly, the study's findings suggest that tongueprint analysis has potential applications in the fields of dentistry and health. Further research is needed to explore these applications and to develop more accurate and reliable biometric systems.
Thirdly, the study's findings highlight the need for further research on biometric variations in Indonesian society. A more comprehensive understanding of biometric variations in Indonesian society would be needed to develop more accurate and reliable biometric systems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study's findings suggest that there are significant differences in tongueprint patterns between the Batak and Chinese ethnic groups. The study's implications for the fields of dentistry and health are significant, highlighting the importance of considering ethnic differences in biometric studies and the potential of tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool. The study's limitations and future directions are also discussed, highlighting the need for further research on biometric variations in Indonesian society.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Differences in Tongueprint Patterns between the Batak and Chinese Ethnicity
Q: What is the significance of tongueprint patterns in biometric studies?
A: Tongueprint patterns are unique to each individual and are protected from external environmental influences due to their location in the oral cavity. This makes them a valuable biometric tool for identification and authentication purposes.
Q: What are the main differences in tongueprint patterns between the Batak and Chinese ethnicity?
A: The study found that the most common tongueprint patterns in Batak women are V-Shape (53.3%), with visible gaps (80.0%), physiological texture (100%), and the tip of the tongue is pointed (80.0%). In contrast, the most common tongueprint patterns in Chinese women are ovoid (60.0%), with visible gaps (86.7%), physiological texture (100%), and the tip of a pointed tongue (73.3%).
Q: What are the implications of the study's findings for the fields of dentistry and health?
A: The study's findings highlight the importance of considering ethnic differences in biometric studies and the potential of tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool. The study's implications for the fields of dentistry and health are significant, and further research is needed to explore these applications.
Q: What are the limitations of the study?
A: The study's sample size is relatively small, consisting of only 30 Batak ethnic people and 30 Chinese ethnic people. A larger sample size would be needed to confirm the study's findings and to generalize the results to the broader population. Additionally, the study's data collection method is limited to printing the tongue using alginate material, and other methods may provide more accurate and reliable results.
Q: What are the future directions for research based on the study's findings?
A: Further research is needed to explore the differences in tongueprint patterns between various ethnic groups in Indonesia. A larger sample size and more diverse population would be needed to confirm the study's findings and to generalize the results to the broader population. Additionally, the study's findings suggest that tongueprint analysis has potential applications in the fields of dentistry and health, and further research is needed to explore these applications.
Q: How can the study's findings be used in real-world applications?
A: The study's findings can be used to develop more accurate and reliable biometric systems, particularly in the fields of dentistry and health. The study's implications for the fields of dentistry and health are significant, and further research is needed to explore these applications.
Q: What are the potential benefits of using tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool?
A: The potential benefits of using tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool include increased accuracy and reliability, reduced costs, and improved security. Tongueprint analysis can also be used to identify individuals with unique tongueprint patterns, which can be useful in forensic science and other applications.
Q: What are the potential challenges of using tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool?
A: The potential challenges of using tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool include the need for a large and diverse population sample, the potential for errors in data collection and analysis, and the need for further research to explore the applications of tongueprint analysis.
Q: How can the study's findings be used to inform policy and practice in the fields of dentistry and health?
A: The study's findings can be used to inform policy and practice in the fields of dentistry and health by highlighting the importance of considering ethnic differences in biometric studies and the potential of tongueprint analysis as a biometric tool. The study's implications for the fields of dentistry and health are significant, and further research is needed to explore these applications.
Q: What are the next steps for research in this area?
A: The next steps for research in this area include further exploration of the differences in tongueprint patterns between various ethnic groups in Indonesia, as well as the development of more accurate and reliable biometric systems using tongueprint analysis. Additionally, further research is needed to explore the applications of tongueprint analysis in the fields of dentistry and health.