Determination Of Priority Maintenance Of Irrigation Areas Due To Budget Refocusing Using AHP (case Study Of UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency)

by ADMIN 139 views

Determination of Priority Maintenance of Irrigation Areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency through the AHP Method

Introduction

The maintenance of irrigation areas is a crucial aspect of ensuring food security and community welfare in rural regions. However, the limited budget allocated for this purpose often hinders the thorough maintenance of these areas. In the Deli Serdang Regency Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD) area, there are nine irrigation areas with a total area of 1,042 hectares that require maintenance. This study aims to analyze the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.

Background

The maintenance of irrigation areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency is a complex task that requires careful consideration of various factors. The limited budget allocated for this purpose often forces the authorities to prioritize certain areas over others. This can lead to unequal distribution of resources and may not necessarily address the needs of the community. In this study, we sought to develop a more objective and data-based approach to determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas.

Methodology

The AHP method was used in this study to analyze the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas. The criteria analyzed include irrigation performance criteria (physical infrastructure, plant productivity, and personnel organization), area size (large, medium, and small), sources of funding (Regional Original Revenue - PAD, General Allocation Funds - DAU, and Special Allocation Funds - DAK), as well as budget target criteria (food security and improvement of irrigation services). The Point Allocation (PA) method was also used as a comparison.

Results

The results of the application of the AHP method show that the budget target criteria are the dominant criteria with a value of 0.33. The dominant sub-criteria in each category are sub-criteria for physical infrastructure (0.55), large area sub-criteria (0.47), sub-criteria for special allocation funds (0.41), and sub-criteria for food security (0.60). Based on this analysis, the first priority sequence for the maintenance of irrigation areas is D.I Jati Baru with a weight of 0.143. Meanwhile, the second to ninth priority sequence is D.I Gumbuk, D.I Sei Tuan, D.I Johar Baru, D.I Kotasan, D.I Jaharum B, D.I Tj. Garbus Kampung, D.I Tanjung Siporkis, and D.I Kampung Melayu.

Comparison with Point Allocation Method

In comparison, the Point Allocation (PA) method produces quite similar results, where the first priority for the maintenance of irrigation areas also falls on the new D.I Jati with a weight of 0.149. The second priority order to the ninth according to this method is also not much different, namely D.I D.I Johar Baru, D.I Jaharum B, D.I Sei Tuan, D.I Kotasan, D.I Tj. Garbus Kampung, D.I Tanjung Siporkis, and D.I Kampung Melayu.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

The AHP method is a decision-making technique that has been proven effective in various contexts, including maintaining public infrastructure such as irrigation. Taking into account various criteria and sub-criteria systematically, AHP allows more objective and data-based decision making. This is very important in situations where the budget is limited, so that the priority of the region that most needs attention can be done appropriately.

The results analysis shows that the criteria for budget targets, especially those related to food security, have a significant influence. This shows that in the context of irrigation maintenance, increasing efficiency and effectiveness in the use of the budget not only focuses on infrastructure, but also on its impact on community food security.

The importance of involving various stakeholders in this process cannot be ignored. By involving the community in collecting data and feedback, the priority determination process will be more transparent and accountable. With a data and participatory approach, it is expected that the maintenance of irrigation areas can be carried out more effectively and sustainably, supporting food security and community welfare in Deli Serdang Regency.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the AHP method in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency. The results show that the budget target criteria are the dominant criteria, and the sub-criteria for physical infrastructure, large area, special allocation funds, and food security have a significant influence. The comparison with the Point Allocation method shows that the AHP method produces similar results. The study highlights the importance of involving various stakeholders in the priority determination process and using a data and participatory approach to ensure that the maintenance of irrigation areas is carried out effectively and sustainably.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. The UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency should prioritize the maintenance of irrigation areas based on the dominant criteria identified in this study, namely budget target criteria.
  2. The sub-criteria for physical infrastructure, large area, special allocation funds, and food security should be given more attention in the maintenance of irrigation areas.
  3. The community should be involved in the priority determination process and in collecting data and feedback to ensure that the maintenance of irrigation areas is carried out effectively and sustainably.
  4. The UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency should use a data and participatory approach in the maintenance of irrigation areas to ensure that the budget is used effectively and efficiently.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study only analyzed the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas. Secondly, the study only used the AHP method and the Point Allocation method as a comparison. Thirdly, the study only focused on the UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency and did not consider other regions. Finally, the study only analyzed the data collected from the questionnaires and did not consider other sources of data.

Future Research Directions

This study provides several future research directions. Firstly, the study can be replicated in other regions to see if the findings are generalizable. Secondly, the study can be extended to include other criteria and sub-criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas. Thirdly, the study can be used as a basis for developing a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to the maintenance of irrigation areas. Finally, the study can be used as a basis for developing a more effective and efficient system for allocating resources for the maintenance of irrigation areas.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Determining Priority Maintenance of Irrigation Areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.

Q: What are the criteria analyzed in this study?

A: The criteria analyzed in this study include irrigation performance criteria (physical infrastructure, plant productivity, and personnel organization), area size (large, medium, and small), sources of funding (Regional Original Revenue - PAD, General Allocation Funds - DAU, and Special Allocation Funds - DAK), as well as budget target criteria (food security and improvement of irrigation services).

Q: What is the AHP method, and how does it work?

A: The AHP method is a decision-making technique that involves breaking down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable parts, and then evaluating each part based on a set of criteria. In this study, the AHP method was used to analyze the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas.

Q: What are the results of the AHP method analysis?

A: The results of the AHP method analysis show that the budget target criteria are the dominant criteria, and the sub-criteria for physical infrastructure, large area, special allocation funds, and food security have a significant influence.

Q: How does the AHP method compare to the Point Allocation method?

A: The Point Allocation method produces similar results to the AHP method, with the first priority for the maintenance of irrigation areas falling on the new D.I Jati with a weight of 0.149.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the maintenance of irrigation areas in UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency?

A: The study highlights the importance of involving various stakeholders in the priority determination process and using a data and participatory approach to ensure that the maintenance of irrigation areas is carried out effectively and sustainably.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the fact that it only analyzed the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas, and it only used the AHP method and the Point Allocation method as a comparison.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: The study provides several future research directions, including replicating the study in other regions, extending the study to include other criteria and sub-criteria, and using the study as a basis for developing a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to the maintenance of irrigation areas.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study for the UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency?

A: The study recommends that the UPTD III Deli Serdang Regency should prioritize the maintenance of irrigation areas based on the dominant criteria identified in this study, and that the community should be involved in the priority determination process and in collecting data and feedback.

Q: What are the benefits of using the AHP method in determining the maintenance priorities of irrigation areas?

A: The AHP method allows for more objective and data-based decision making, and it takes into account various criteria and sub-criteria systematically.

Q: What are the benefits of involving the community in the priority determination process?

A: Involving the community in the priority determination process ensures that the maintenance of irrigation areas is carried out effectively and sustainably, and it also ensures that the budget is used effectively and efficiently.

Q: What are the benefits of using a data and participatory approach in the maintenance of irrigation areas?

A: Using a data and participatory approach in the maintenance of irrigation areas ensures that the maintenance is carried out effectively and sustainably, and it also ensures that the budget is used effectively and efficiently.