Design And Experimental Study The Influence Of The Bulkhead On The Crucible Crucible Cup Capacity 3 Kg Fuel LPG Cover On The Fuel Room Temperature

by ADMIN 147 views

Introduction

The casting industry plays a vital role in product development, both for machinery and household products. One crucial tool in the process is a metal smelting kitchen. Various types of fusion kitchens have been developed by researchers to improve the efficiency and quality of the products produced. This study focuses on crucible smelting kitchen design for nonferrous metals with a capacity of 3 kg using LPG gas fuel. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the addition of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap to the amount of heat needed to melt metal and fuel consumption used.

Background of the Study

The casting industry is a significant sector in product development, and the smelting kitchen is a crucial tool in the process. The smelting kitchen is used to melt metal, and the efficiency and quality of the products produced depend on the design and performance of the kitchen. Various types of fusion kitchens have been developed by researchers to improve the efficiency and quality of the products produced. However, the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap has not been extensively studied, and its effect on the amount of heat needed to melt metal and fuel consumption used is not well understood.

Research Methods

In this study, the method used included the design, manufacturing, and testing of the smelting kitchen. The test was carried out by melting 1 kg of aluminum in two conditions: one without a bulkhead on the kitchen cap and the other with a bulkhead. This process is also assisted by air flow from the blower to ensure the temperature in the optimal combustion chamber. All tests were carried out at the Foundry of Mechanical Engineering Foundry, University of North Sumatra (USU).

Research Result

From the test results, it is known that the fusion kitchen that uses a bulkhead on the lid has a better performance than those who do not use bulkheads. The melting kitchen with a bulkhead absorbs heat of 20,051,608 kJ, with a heat-wasted heat rate of 3,735,929 kJ/hour and spent 0.42 kg of fuel in the fusion time of 18 minutes. Conversely, the smelting kitchen without a bulkhead absorbs a much higher heat, which is 31,912,738 kJ, with a heat wasted rate of 6,624.29 kJ/hour and spent 0.68 kg of fuel in a longer smelting time, which is 25 minutes.

Analysis and Explanation

The results showed that the addition of bulkheads to the fusion kitchen cover provides significant efficiency in the metal fuil process. In the spawning kitchen without a bulkhead, higher energy loss is caused by the high rate of wasted heat, which results in more fuel needed to reach the temperature needed for smelting. With the existence of a bulkhead, the heat absorbed is more focused, so that the lost energy is reduced and reduces the amount of fuel needed.

Discussion

The success of the use of this bulkhead is very dependent on the design and material used. The bulkhead must be strong enough to withstand high temperatures and designed in such a way as to ensure the flow of air remains optimal. It also opens opportunities for further research on the most effective forms and materials of bulkheads and how this can be applied in a larger industrial scale.

Conclusion

Thus, this research not only contributes to the development of fusion kitchen technology but also provides new insights on energy savings and efficiency in the metal casting industry, which is increasingly important in the era of sustainability and efficiency of current resources.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  • The use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap is recommended to improve the efficiency of the smelting kitchen.
  • Further research is needed to investigate the most effective forms and materials of bulkheads and how this can be applied in a larger industrial scale.
  • The design and material used for the bulkhead must be strong enough to withstand high temperatures and designed in such a way as to ensure the flow of air remains optimal.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

  • The study was conducted using a small-scale smelting kitchen, and the results may not be applicable to larger industrial scales.
  • The study only investigated the effect of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap on the amount of heat needed to melt metal and fuel consumption used.
  • Further research is needed to investigate the effect of other factors, such as the type of metal being melted and the design of the smelting kitchen, on the efficiency of the smelting process.

Future Research Directions

Based on the results of this study, the following future research directions are suggested:

  • Investigating the effect of different forms and materials of bulkheads on the efficiency of the smelting kitchen.
  • Investigating the effect of other factors, such as the type of metal being melted and the design of the smelting kitchen, on the efficiency of the smelting process.
  • Developing a larger-scale smelting kitchen that incorporates the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has shown that the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap can improve the efficiency of the smelting kitchen. The results of this study provide new insights on energy savings and efficiency in the metal casting industry, which is increasingly important in the era of sustainability and efficiency of current resources. Further research is needed to investigate the most effective forms and materials of bulkheads and how this can be applied in a larger industrial scale.

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the addition of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap to the amount of heat needed to melt metal and fuel consumption used.

Q: What type of smelting kitchen was used in this study?

A: The smelting kitchen used in this study is a crucible smelting kitchen with a capacity of 3 kg using LPG gas fuel.

Q: What were the test conditions used in this study?

A: The test was carried out by melting 1 kg of aluminum in two conditions: one without a bulkhead on the kitchen cap and the other with a bulkhead.

Q: What were the results of the test?

A: The results showed that the fusion kitchen that uses a bulkhead on the lid has a better performance than those who do not use bulkheads. The melting kitchen with a bulkhead absorbs heat of 20,051,608 kJ, with a heat-wasted heat rate of 3,735,929 kJ/hour and spent 0.42 kg of fuel in the fusion time of 18 minutes.

Q: What are the benefits of using a bulkhead on the kitchen cap?

A: The addition of bulkheads to the fusion kitchen cover provides significant efficiency in the metal fuil process. With the existence of a bulkhead, the heat absorbed is more focused, so that the lost energy is reduced and reduces the amount of fuel needed.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the study was conducted using a small-scale smelting kitchen, and the results may not be applicable to larger industrial scales. The study only investigated the effect of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap on the amount of heat needed to melt metal and fuel consumption used.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Based on the results of this study, the following future research directions are suggested: investigating the effect of different forms and materials of bulkheads on the efficiency of the smelting kitchen, investigating the effect of other factors, such as the type of metal being melted and the design of the smelting kitchen, on the efficiency of the smelting process, and developing a larger-scale smelting kitchen that incorporates the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The results of this study provide new insights on energy savings and efficiency in the metal casting industry, which is increasingly important in the era of sustainability and efficiency of current resources.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made: the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap is recommended to improve the efficiency of the smelting kitchen, further research is needed to investigate the most effective forms and materials of bulkheads and how this can be applied in a larger industrial scale, and the design and material used for the bulkhead must be strong enough to withstand high temperatures and designed in such a way as to ensure the flow of air remains optimal.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The results of this study can be applied in various industries, such as the metal casting industry, where the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap can improve the efficiency of the smelting process and reduce energy consumption.

Q: What are the potential future developments of this study?

A: The results of this study can be used as a basis for further research and development in the field of smelting kitchen technology, such as the development of new forms and materials of bulkheads, and the design of larger-scale smelting kitchens that incorporate the use of a bulkhead on the kitchen cap.