Criminal Law Enforcement Against Members Of The Narcotics Abuse Police (Decision Study Number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN)
Criminal Law Enforcement Against Members of the Narcotics Abuse Police: A Decision Study Analysis
Introduction
The Indonesian justice system relies heavily on the police to execute and enforce laws, as well as maintain security in the country. As the spearhead of law enforcement, the police are expected to carry out their duties effectively, including efforts to prevent and eradicate criminal acts, such as narcotics abuse. However, what if those involved in narcotics abuse are members of the police themselves? This article will discuss the criminal law enforcement against members of the police who are proven to abuse narcotics based on the study of decision number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN.
The Importance of Law Enforcement Against Narcotics Abuse
In Indonesia, narcotics abuse is regulated by Law Number 35 Year 2009, which provides criminal provisions detailing sanctions for perpetrators of narcotics abuse. The actions taken against members of the police involved in narcotics abuse are a challenge, as the police not only act as law enforcement but also as legal subjects responsible for their actions. The police must uphold the law and maintain public trust, and any breach of this trust can have severe consequences.
Narcotics Abuse Cases by Police Officers
Decision Number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN provides a clear picture of how criminal law is upheld against a member of the police involved in narcotics abuse. In this case, the defendant, Suriadi alias Adi, was charged with violating several articles in Law No. 35 of 2009, including Article 114 paragraph (1) and Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a. His actions included an evil experiment or agreement to sell and abuse Narcotics Group I.
The judge's decision to impose a three-year prison sentence to the defendant reflects legal firmness in overcoming narcotics criminal acts, especially those carried out by members of the police. This indicates that the law does not view fur and every violation of the law must be given a worth sanction, no exception for law enforcement members themselves.
Criminal Law Policy in Narcotics Prevention
Criminal law policy in the prevention of narcotics criminal acts in Indonesia is divided into two types: non-identification policies and penal policies.
Non-identification policy
This policy prioritizes preventive efforts to prevent narcotics abuse. This includes socialization, counseling, and approaches to various levels of society. This activity aims to build public awareness of the dangers of narcotics and the importance of maintaining mental and physical health. Prevention is key to overcoming narcotics abuse, and non-identification policies play a crucial role in this effort.
Penal policy
Unlike non-identification policies, this policy is repressive, which emphasizes law enforcement of actors who have committed criminal acts. This is in accordance with Law Number 35 Year 2009, which provides strict sanctions for the perpetrators of narcotics abuse, including police officers. Penal policies serve as a deterrent to prevent narcotics abuse, and the law must be upheld indiscriminately, including those who have the authority to enforce the law.
Conclusion
Narcotics abuse cases by members of the police raised in decision number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN highlighted the importance of fair and transparent law enforcement. The criminal offense against Suriadi shows that the law must be upheld indiscriminately, including those who have the authority to enforce the law. In a broader context, criminal law policies must be balanced between preventive and repressive efforts in order to have a positive impact in overcoming the problem of narcotics abuse in Indonesia. Consistent and fair law enforcement is the key to maintaining the integrity of the police institution and fostering public confidence in law enforcement officials.
Recommendations
Based on the analysis of decision number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN, the following recommendations can be made:
- The police must uphold the law and maintain public trust by enforcing laws against narcotics abuse, including against their own members.
- Non-identification policies and penal policies must be balanced to prevent narcotics abuse and maintain public confidence in law enforcement officials.
- The law must be upheld indiscriminately, including those who have the authority to enforce the law.
- Consistent and fair law enforcement is the key to maintaining the integrity of the police institution and fostering public confidence in law enforcement officials.
By implementing these recommendations, the police can maintain public trust and effectively prevent and eradicate narcotics abuse in Indonesia.
Frequently Asked Questions: Criminal Law Enforcement Against Members of the Narcotics Abuse Police
Q: What is the role of the police in enforcing laws against narcotics abuse?
A: The police play a crucial role in enforcing laws against narcotics abuse in Indonesia. As the spearhead of law enforcement, the police are expected to carry out their duties effectively, including efforts to prevent and eradicate criminal acts, such as narcotics abuse.
Q: What is the significance of decision number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN in the context of narcotics abuse cases by police officers?
A: Decision number 3115/Pid.Sus/2017/PN-MDN provides a clear picture of how criminal law is upheld against a member of the police involved in narcotics abuse. The judge's decision to impose a three-year prison sentence to the defendant reflects legal firmness in overcoming narcotics criminal acts, especially those carried out by members of the police.
Q: What are the two types of criminal law policies in the prevention of narcotics criminal acts in Indonesia?
A: The two types of criminal law policies in the prevention of narcotics criminal acts in Indonesia are non-identification policies and penal policies. Non-identification policies prioritize preventive efforts to prevent narcotics abuse, while penal policies emphasize law enforcement of actors who have committed criminal acts.
Q: What is the importance of prevention in overcoming narcotics abuse?
A: Prevention is key to overcoming narcotics abuse. Non-identification policies play a crucial role in this effort by building public awareness of the dangers of narcotics and the importance of maintaining mental and physical health.
Q: What is the role of penal policies in preventing narcotics abuse?
A: Penal policies serve as a deterrent to prevent narcotics abuse. The law must be upheld indiscriminately, including those who have the authority to enforce the law. Penal policies provide strict sanctions for the perpetrators of narcotics abuse, including police officers.
Q: What is the significance of consistent and fair law enforcement in maintaining the integrity of the police institution and fostering public confidence in law enforcement officials?
A: Consistent and fair law enforcement is the key to maintaining the integrity of the police institution and fostering public confidence in law enforcement officials. The police must uphold the law and maintain public trust by enforcing laws against narcotics abuse, including against their own members.
Q: What are the recommendations for implementing consistent and fair law enforcement against narcotics abuse?
A: The following recommendations can be made:
- The police must uphold the law and maintain public trust by enforcing laws against narcotics abuse, including against their own members.
- Non-identification policies and penal policies must be balanced to prevent narcotics abuse and maintain public confidence in law enforcement officials.
- The law must be upheld indiscriminately, including those who have the authority to enforce the law.
- Consistent and fair law enforcement is the key to maintaining the integrity of the police institution and fostering public confidence in law enforcement officials.
By implementing these recommendations, the police can maintain public trust and effectively prevent and eradicate narcotics abuse in Indonesia.