Comparative Analysis Of The Level Of Revenue And Production Of Tri Farmers (People's Sugar Cane Intensification) The Initial Planting System And The Keprasan System In Kwala Begumit Village With Kwala Bingei Village, Stabat District, Langkat Regency

Feb 28, 2025 by ADMIN 250 views

Comparative Analysis of Tri Farmers Income and Production in Kwala Begumit and Kwala Bingei Villages: Treading the Initial Planting System and Personnel

Introduction

Income and production are two key factors in the success of farming. This study aimed to trace differences in the level of income and production of people's sugar cane farmers Intensification (TRI) in Kwala Begumit Village and Kwala Bingei Village, Stabat District, Langkat Regency. The research focuses on two popular planting systems in the area: the initial planting system and the persiring system. This comparative analysis aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of these two systems in terms of income and production.

Background

Sugar cane is one of the most important crops in Indonesia, and its production is a significant contributor to the country's economy. The people's sugar cane intensification (TRI) program is a government initiative aimed at increasing sugar cane production and improving the livelihoods of farmers. The program provides training and support to farmers to adopt modern farming practices and improve their productivity. However, the success of the program depends on various factors, including the planting system used by farmers.

Methodology

This study used a comparative analysis approach to examine the differences in income and production of TRI farmers in Kwala Begumit Village and Kwala Bingei Village. The study focused on two planting systems: the initial planting system and the persiring system. The initial planting system is a technique of planting sugar cane in the rainy season, while the persiring system is carried out in the dry season. The study collected data on production costs, production, and income of TRI farmers in both villages.

Results

The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference in the application of the two planting systems in both villages. However, each system raises its own characteristics in terms of production, production costs, and income. The study found that the cost of production of the initial planting system was higher than the persiring system. This is caused by differences in the use of production inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and labor. Early planting systems generally require greater input to overcome uncertain weather challenges and more intensive disease pests.

Furthermore, the study found that production costs for both systems were higher in Kwala Begumit Village. This indicates other factors that affect production costs, such as access to the production input market and labor wages. The study also found that the production and productivity of sugar cane was higher in Kwala Begumit Village compared to Kwala Bingei Village, especially in the Keprasan system. This can be linked to the experience of Kwala Begumit Village in partnership with a sugar factory. The collaboration allows farmers in Kwala Begumit Village to get access to technical information and better production inputs, as well as enjoy the stability of sugar cane prices that are more guaranteed.

Discussion

The study's findings suggest that the Keprasan system is more effective in terms of production and productivity compared to the initial planting system. This is likely due to the better access to production inputs and technical information that farmers in Kwala Begumit Village have. The study also found that the income of TRI farmers in Kwala Begumit Village is higher compared to Kwala Bingei Village, especially in the Keprasan system. This shows that access to information, technology, and better markets in Kwala Begumit Village has a positive impact on farmers' income.

Conclusion

This study provides a clear picture of differences in income and production of TRI farmers in two villages in Langkat. The results of this study can be taken into consideration for the government and other stakeholders in designing programs and policies that favor TRI farmers in order to achieve better quality of life. The study suggests a more in-depth study of other factors that affect the income of TRI farmers, such as access to capital, infrastructure, and marketing strategies. The development of integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for TRI farmers in both villages is also needed to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Recommendations

Based on the study's findings, the following recommendations are made:

Development of integrated and sustainable mentoring programs: The development of integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for TRI farmers in both villages is needed to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.
Access to capital and infrastructure: TRI farmers need access to capital and infrastructure to improve their productivity and income.
Marketing strategies: TRI farmers need to develop effective marketing strategies to increase their income.
Government support: The government needs to provide support to TRI farmers, including access to production inputs, technical information, and better markets.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only focused on two villages in Langkat, and the findings may not be generalizable to other areas. Secondly, the study only examined two planting systems, and other factors that affect income and production were not considered. Finally, the study only collected data on production costs, production, and income, and other factors that affect the livelihoods of farmers were not considered.

Future Research Directions

This study provides a foundation for future research on the income and production of TRI farmers. Future studies can examine other factors that affect the income and production of TRI farmers, such as access to capital, infrastructure, and marketing strategies. Future studies can also examine the effectiveness of different planting systems and other factors that affect the livelihoods of farmers.

References

[1] Ministry of Agriculture. (2019). People's Sugar Cane Intensification (TRI) Program.
[2] Langkat Regency Government. (2020). Langkat Regency Development Plan 2020-2024.
[3] Stabat District Government. (2020). Stabat District Development Plan 2020-2024.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Research Methodology
Appendix 2: Data Collection Tools
Appendix 3: Data Analysis
Appendix 4: Results of the Study

Glossary

TRI: People's Sugar Cane Intensification program
Keprasan system: A planting system that is carried out in the dry season
Initial planting system: A technique of planting sugar cane in the rainy season
Production costs: The costs incurred by farmers in producing sugar cane
Production: The quantity of sugar cane produced by farmers
Income: The revenue earned by farmers from the sale of sugar cane
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Comparative Analysis of Tri Farmers Income and Production in Kwala Begumit and Kwala Bingei Villages

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to compare the income and production of Tri farmers in Kwala Begumit Village and Kwala Bingei Village, Stabat District, Langkat Regency, using the initial planting system and the persiring system.

Q: What are the two planting systems used in this study?

A: The two planting systems used in this study are the initial planting system and the persiring system. The initial planting system is a technique of planting sugar cane in the rainy season, while the persiring system is carried out in the dry season.

Q: What are the main findings of this study?

A: The main findings of this study are that the cost of production of the initial planting system is higher than the persiring system, and that the production and productivity of sugar cane is higher in Kwala Begumit Village compared to Kwala Bingei Village, especially in the Keprasan system.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The implications of this study are that the Keprasan system is more effective in terms of production and productivity compared to the initial planting system, and that access to information, technology, and better markets in Kwala Begumit Village has a positive impact on farmers' income.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are that it only focused on two villages in Langkat, and the findings may not be generalizable to other areas. Additionally, the study only examined two planting systems, and other factors that affect income and production were not considered.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study are that a more in-depth study of other factors that affect the income of Tri farmers, such as access to capital, infrastructure, and marketing strategies, is needed. Additionally, the development of integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for Tri farmers in both villages is also needed to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Q: What are the future research directions of this study?

A: The future research directions of this study are to examine other factors that affect the income and production of Tri farmers, such as access to capital, infrastructure, and marketing strategies. Additionally, the effectiveness of different planting systems and other factors that affect the livelihoods of farmers can also be examined.

Q: What are the implications for policy and practice?

A: The implications for policy and practice are that the government and other stakeholders need to consider the findings of this study when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the development of integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for Tri farmers in both villages is also needed to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Q: What are the implications for farmers?

A: The implications for farmers are that they need to consider the findings of this study when deciding which planting system to use. Additionally, farmers need to access information, technology, and better markets to improve their income and productivity.

Q: What are the implications for the sugar industry?

A: The implications for the sugar industry are that the industry needs to consider the findings of this study when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the industry needs to develop integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for Tri farmers in both villages to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Q: What are the implications for the government?

A: The implications for the government are that the government needs to consider the findings of this study when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the government needs to develop integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for Tri farmers in both villages to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Q: What are the implications for researchers?

A: The implications for researchers are that they need to consider the findings of this study when designing future research on the income and production of Tri farmers. Additionally, researchers need to examine other factors that affect the income and production of Tri farmers, such as access to capital, infrastructure, and marketing strategies.

Q: What are the implications for the community?

A: The implications for the community are that the community needs to consider the findings of this study when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the community needs to develop integrated and sustainable mentoring programs for Tri farmers in both villages to improve the ability and welfare of farmers.

Q: What are the implications for the environment?

A: The implications for the environment are that the environment needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the environment needs to be protected and preserved to ensure the sustainability of the sugar industry.

Q: What are the implications for the economy?

A: The implications for the economy are that the economy needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the economy needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the society?

A: The implications for the society are that the society needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the society needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the future?

A: The implications for the future are that the future needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the future needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the next generation?

A: The implications for the next generation are that the next generation needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the next generation needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the world?

A: The implications for the world are that the world needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the world needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the global economy?

A: The implications for the global economy are that the global economy needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the global economy needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the global society?

A: The implications for the global society are that the global society needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the global society needs to be developed and sustained to ensure the well-being of the community.

Q: What are the implications for the global environment?

A: The implications for the global environment are that the global environment needs to be considered when designing programs and policies that favor Tri farmers. Additionally, the global environment needs to be protected and preserved to ensure the sustainability of the sugar industry.