Comparative Analysis Of Corn Productivity And Revenue (Zea Mays L.) Before And After Using Seed And Fertilizer Assistance (Case Study: Durian Lingga Village, Sei Bingai Kec.

by ADMIN 174 views

Introduction

Corn is one of the most widely cultivated crops globally, and its productivity and revenue are crucial for the economic growth of rural communities. In Indonesia, corn is a significant crop, and its production is influenced by various factors, including the quality of seeds and fertilizers used. This study aims to analyze the productivity and income of corn farming in Durian Lingga Village, Sei Bingai District, Langkat Regency, before and after using seed and fertilizer assistance. The research focuses on the impact of government support in providing access to quality agricultural resources for farmers.

Background

Corn farming in Indonesia is a significant contributor to the country's agricultural economy. However, the productivity and revenue of corn farming are often affected by various factors, including the quality of seeds and fertilizers used. In recent years, the Indonesian government has implemented various programs to support farmers, including the provision of seed and fertilizer assistance. This study aims to explore the impact of this assistance on corn productivity and revenue in Durian Lingga Village.

Methodology

This study was conducted in 2016, and the data were collected from farmers in Durian Lingga Village. The research methodology involved a comparative analysis of corn productivity and revenue before and after using seed and fertilizer assistance. The data were collected through surveys and interviews with farmers, and the results were analyzed using statistical methods.

Sources of Seeds and Fertilizers

Before receiving assistance, farmers in Durian Lingga Village obtained seeds and fertilizers from the Kiosk of Agricultural Production Facilities. The process of obtaining assistance involved the preparation and delivery of prospective recipients of love (CPCL) until finally receiving seed assistance and fertilizer. The results showed that the quality of seeds after receiving assistance increased compared to the quality of previous seeds. However, for the quality of fertilizer, there was no significant difference between before and after assistance.

Productivity and Revenue

In terms of productivity, corn land that was managed after using the help of seeds and fertilizer showed better results. The average productivity of corn land reached 4,766 kg/ha, which is a significant increase compared to productivity before using assistance. In addition, net income from corn farming also increased, reaching Rp 7,682,267 after seed and fertilizer assistance was received.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

The results of this study provide a clear picture of the positive influence of seed and fertilizer assistance on productivity and income of corn farming. Increased productivity of 4,766 kg/ha shows that the assistance is effective in increasing agricultural output. This confirms the importance of government support in providing access to farmers for quality agricultural resources.

On the other hand, although the quality of fertilizer does not show significant differences, other aspects such as farmers' understanding of appropriate fertilization techniques and the use of fertilizer according to plant needs are very influential on crop yields. In addition, the success of the administrative process in submitting assistance shows that farmers' involvement in farmer group activities is very important to facilitate the process.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of technical and material assistance for farmers, which not only helps in increasing productivity but also contributes to improving the economy of the agricultural community. Active involvement and continuous support are needed to ensure the sustainability of the results obtained from the assistance program. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and agricultural extension services to develop effective programs that support farmers in improving their productivity and income.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. Continued Support: The government and related institutions should continue to provide support to farmers in the form of seed and fertilizer assistance.
  2. Improved Administrative Process: The administrative process for submitting assistance should be improved to facilitate the process and ensure that farmers receive the assistance they need.
  3. Farmer Education: Farmers should be educated on appropriate fertilization techniques and the use of fertilizer according to plant needs to improve crop yields.
  4. Farmer Group Activities: Farmers should be involved in farmer group activities to facilitate the process of submitting assistance and to share knowledge and experiences.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

  1. Small Sample Size: The sample size of this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  2. Limited Data: The data collected in this study are limited to the period of 2016, which may not reflect the current situation.
  3. Lack of Control Group: This study did not have a control group, which may limit the ability to determine the causal relationship between the assistance and the outcomes.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to address the limitations of this study and explore the following research directions:

  1. Longitudinal Study: A longitudinal study should be conducted to examine the long-term effects of seed and fertilizer assistance on corn productivity and revenue.
  2. Control Group: A control group should be included in future studies to determine the causal relationship between the assistance and the outcomes.
  3. Expanded Sample Size: The sample size should be expanded to include more farmers and to increase the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the impact of seed and fertilizer assistance on corn productivity and revenue in Durian Lingga Village. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of technical and material assistance for farmers and highlight the need for continued support and improved administrative processes. Future research should aim to address the limitations of this study and explore new research directions to further understand the impact of seed and fertilizer assistance on agricultural productivity and revenue.

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the productivity and income of corn farming in Durian Lingga Village, Sei Bingai District, Langkat Regency, before and after using seed and fertilizer assistance.

Q: What are the sources of seeds and fertilizers used by farmers in Durian Lingga Village?

A: Before receiving assistance, farmers in Durian Lingga Village obtained seeds and fertilizers from the Kiosk of Agricultural Production Facilities. The process of obtaining assistance involved the preparation and delivery of prospective recipients of love (CPCL) until finally receiving seed assistance and fertilizer.

Q: What are the results of the study in terms of productivity and revenue?

A: The results of the study show that the average productivity of corn land reached 4,766 kg/ha, which is a significant increase compared to productivity before using assistance. In addition, net income from corn farming also increased, reaching Rp 7,682,267 after seed and fertilizer assistance was received.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including a small sample size, limited data, and the lack of a control group.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  1. Continued Support: The government and related institutions should continue to provide support to farmers in the form of seed and fertilizer assistance.
  2. Improved Administrative Process: The administrative process for submitting assistance should be improved to facilitate the process and ensure that farmers receive the assistance they need.
  3. Farmer Education: Farmers should be educated on appropriate fertilization techniques and the use of fertilizer according to plant needs to improve crop yields.
  4. Farmer Group Activities: Farmers should be involved in farmer group activities to facilitate the process of submitting assistance and to share knowledge and experiences.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to address the limitations of this study and explore the following research directions:

  1. Longitudinal Study: A longitudinal study should be conducted to examine the long-term effects of seed and fertilizer assistance on corn productivity and revenue.
  2. Control Group: A control group should be included in future studies to determine the causal relationship between the assistance and the outcomes.
  3. Expanded Sample Size: The sample size should be expanded to include more farmers and to increase the generalizability of the findings.

Q: What are the implications of this study for policymakers and agricultural extension services?

A: The findings of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and agricultural extension services to develop effective programs that support farmers in improving their productivity and income. The study emphasizes the importance of technical and material assistance for farmers and highlights the need for continued support and improved administrative processes.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The findings of this study can be applied in various ways, including:

  1. Policy Development: The study's findings can inform policy development related to agricultural support programs.
  2. Agricultural Extension Services: The study's findings can guide the development of agricultural extension services that provide technical and material assistance to farmers.
  3. Farmer Education: The study's findings can inform farmer education programs that focus on improving crop yields and increasing income.

Q: What are the potential limitations of applying the findings of this study?

A: The potential limitations of applying the findings of this study include:

  1. Contextual Factors: The study's findings may not be applicable in other contexts due to differences in agricultural practices, climate, and socioeconomic factors.
  2. Scalability: The study's findings may not be scalable to larger populations or different regions.
  3. Sustainability: The study's findings may not be sustainable in the long term due to changes in government policies, agricultural practices, or socioeconomic factors.