Cdktf: Upgraded Packages And Now Logical Ids Are Different

by ADMIN 59 views

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the issue of logical IDs being different after upgrading certain packages in a cdktf project. We will discuss the expected behavior, actual behavior, steps to reproduce, and possible solutions to this problem.

Expected Behavior

When upgrading packages in a cdktf project, we expect the logical IDs of resources to remain the same. However, after upgrading the following packages, the logical IDs of resources are different:

  • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
  • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
  • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
  • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11

Actual Behavior

After upgrading the packages, the logical IDs of resources are different. For example, the original logical ID of a resource might be examplestack_cdktfexamplevpn_F638B234, but the new logical ID is cdktf-example-vpn.

Steps to Reproduce

To reproduce this issue, follow these steps:

  1. Update the packages in your cdktf project to the latest versions:
    • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
    • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
    • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
    • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11
  2. Run your cdktf project to see the different logical IDs of resources.

Versions

Here are the versions of the packages that were updated:

  • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
  • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
  • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
  • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11

Providers

Here are the providers required by the configuration and state:

  • New:
    • provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws] version 5.65.0
  • Old:
    • provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws] version 4.51.0

Possible Solutions

There are several possible solutions to this issue:

  1. Downgrade the packages: Downgrade the packages to their previous versions to see if the issue is resolved.
  2. Check the documentation: Check the documentation of the packages to see if there are any changes or updates that might be causing the issue.
  3. Submit a pull request: Submit a pull request to the cdktf project to fix the issue.

Workarounds

There are several workarounds to this issue:

  1. Use a different package: Use a different package that is not affected by the issue.
  2. Modify the code: Modify the code to use a different logical ID for the resource.
  3. Use a workaround: Use a workaround to resolve the issue.

Anything Else?

If you have any other information or questions about this issue, please add a comment below.

References

There are no references to this issue.

Help Wanted

If you are interested in contributing a fix to this issue, please leave a comment below.

Community Note

Q: What is the issue with the logical IDs of resources in cdktf?

A: The issue is that after upgrading certain packages in a cdktf project, the logical IDs of resources are different. This can cause problems when trying to manage and maintain the resources.

Q: What packages were updated to cause this issue?

A: The following packages were updated to cause this issue:

  • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
  • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
  • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
  • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11

Q: What is the expected behavior of the logical IDs of resources in cdktf?

A: The expected behavior is that the logical IDs of resources remain the same even after upgrading packages.

Q: What is the actual behavior of the logical IDs of resources in cdktf?

A: The actual behavior is that the logical IDs of resources are different after upgrading packages.

Q: How can I reproduce this issue?

A: To reproduce this issue, follow these steps:

  1. Update the packages in your cdktf project to the latest versions:
    • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
    • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
    • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
    • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11
  2. Run your cdktf project to see the different logical IDs of resources.

Q: What are the versions of the packages that were updated?

A: The versions of the packages that were updated are:

  • github.com/aws/constructs-go/constructs/v10 from v10.1.225 to v10.4.2
  • github.com/aws/jsii-runtime-go from v1.73.0 to v1.109.0
  • github.com/cdktf/cdktf-provider-aws-go/aws/v12 from v12.0.1 to v19.56.1
  • github.com/hashicorp/terraform-cdk-go/cdktf from v0.15.0 to v0.20.11

Q: What are the providers required by the configuration and state?

A: The providers required by the configuration and state are:

  • New:
    • provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws] version 5.65.0
  • Old:
    • provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws] version 4.51.0

Q: What are the possible solutions to this issue?

A: The possible solutions to this issue are:

  1. Downgrade the packages: Downgrade the packages to their previous versions to see if the issue is resolved.
  2. Check the documentation: Check the documentation of the packages to see if there are any changes or updates that might be causing the issue.
  3. Submit a pull request: Submit a pull request to the cdktf project to fix the issue.

Q: What are the workarounds to this issue?

A: The workarounds to this issue are:

  1. Use a different package: Use a different package that is not affected by the issue.
  2. Modify the code: Modify the code to use a different logical ID for the resource.
  3. Use a workaround: Use a workaround to resolve the issue.

Q: Is there any help available for this issue?

A: Yes, there is help available for this issue. If you are interested in contributing a fix to this issue, please leave a comment below.

Q: How can I vote on this issue?

A: You can vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.