[BUG] Validation Rule NoRootFolder Should Skip Synchronized DataExtensions

Mar 13, 2025 by ADMIN 75 views

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss a bug in the validation rule noRootFolder, which is causing issues with synchronized data extensions. The bug is that the rule is not skipping the synchronized data extensions, resulting in them being flagged as errors. We will explore the current behavior, the expected behavior, and the steps to reproduce the issue. Additionally, we will discuss the environment and version of the software being used.

Is There an Existing Issue for This?

Before we dive into the details of the bug, it's essential to check if there is an existing issue for this problem. After conducting a thorough search, we found that there is no existing issue for this specific problem.

Current Behavior

The current behavior of the validation rule noRootFolder is that it is flagging synchronized data extensions as errors. These data extensions always sit in the root folder, and the rule is not skipping them. This is causing issues with the data extensions, as they should not be changed or moved from their original location.

Expected Behavior

The expected behavior of the validation rule noRootFolder is that it should skip synchronized data extensions. This is because these data extensions should not be changed or moved from their original location. The rule should not flag them as errors, and they should be allowed to remain in the root folder.

Steps to Reproduce

To reproduce this issue, follow these steps:

Go to the '...' page.
Click on the '....' button.
Run the '...' command.
See the error message indicating that the synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder.

Version and Environment

The version of the software being used is 7.10.0. The environment is as follows:

OS: [Insert OS information]
Node: [Insert Node information]
npm: [Insert npm information]

Participation

We are willing to submit a pull request for this issue. We believe that this is a critical bug that needs to be fixed, and we are eager to contribute to the solution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the validation rule noRootFolder is not skipping synchronized data extensions, resulting in them being flagged as errors. This is causing issues with the data extensions, and we believe that the rule should be modified to skip them. We have outlined the current behavior, the expected behavior, and the steps to reproduce the issue. We are willing to submit a pull request for this issue and contribute to the solution.

Related Issues

[BUG] validation rule noRootFolder should skip synchronized dataExtensions
[FEATURE] add option to skip synchronized data extensions in noRootFolder rule
[IMPROVEMENT] improve error messages for noRootFolder rule

Use Cases

Synchronized data extensions should not be changed or moved from their original location.
The noRootFolder rule should skip synchronized data extensions to prevent errors.
The rule should be modified to allow synchronized data extensions to remain in the root folder.

Technical Details

The noRootFolder rule is not skipping synchronized data extensions due to a bug in the validation logic.
The rule is flagging synchronized data extensions as errors, resulting in issues with the data extensions.
The solution involves modifying the noRootFolder rule to skip synchronized data extensions.

Code Snippets

// noRootFolder rule if (dataExtension.isSynchronized) { // skip synchronized data extensions return; }


* ```javascript
// error message for noRootFolder rule
if (dataExtension.isSynchronized) {
  // error message indicating that synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder
  return "Error: Synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder.";
}

Commit Messages

"Fix bug in noRootFolder rule to skip synchronized data extensions"
"Add option to skip synchronized data extensions in noRootFolder rule"
"Improve error messages for noRootFolder rule"
Q&A: Validation Rule noRootFolder and Synchronized Data Extensions ====================================================================

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed a bug in the validation rule noRootFolder, which is causing issues with synchronized data extensions. We outlined the current behavior, the expected behavior, and the steps to reproduce the issue. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to this issue.

Q: What is the noRootFolder rule?

A: The noRootFolder rule is a validation rule that checks if data extensions are allowed in the root folder. If a data extension is not allowed in the root folder, the rule will flag it as an error.

Q: Why is the noRootFolder rule flagging synchronized data extensions as errors?

A: The noRootFolder rule is flagging synchronized data extensions as errors because it is not skipping them. Synchronized data extensions should not be changed or moved from their original location, and the rule should not flag them as errors.

Q: What is the expected behavior of the noRootFolder rule?

A: The expected behavior of the noRootFolder rule is that it should skip synchronized data extensions. This is because these data extensions should not be changed or moved from their original location.

Q: How can I reproduce this issue?

A: To reproduce this issue, follow these steps:

Go to the '...' page.
Click on the '....' button.
Run the '...' command.
See the error message indicating that the synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder.

Q: What is the version of the software being used?

A: The version of the software being used is 7.10.0.

Q: What is the environment being used?

A: The environment being used is as follows:

OS: [Insert OS information]
Node: [Insert Node information]
npm: [Insert npm information]

Q: Can I submit a pull request for this issue?

A: Yes, we are willing to submit a pull request for this issue. We believe that this is a critical bug that needs to be fixed, and we are eager to contribute to the solution.

Q: What are the related issues for this bug?

A: The related issues for this bug are:

[BUG] validation rule noRootFolder should skip synchronized dataExtensions
[FEATURE] add option to skip synchronized data extensions in noRootFolder rule
[IMPROVEMENT] improve error messages for noRootFolder rule

Q: What are the use cases for this bug?

A: The use cases for this bug are:

Synchronized data extensions should not be changed or moved from their original location.
The noRootFolder rule should skip synchronized data extensions to prevent errors.
The rule should be modified to allow synchronized data extensions to remain in the root folder.

Q: What are the technical details of this bug?

A: The technical details of this bug are:

The noRootFolder rule is not skipping synchronized data extensions due to a bug in the validation logic.
The rule is flagging synchronized data extensions as errors, resulting in issues with the data extensions.
The solution involves modifying the noRootFolder rule to skip synchronized data extensions.

Q: Can I see some code snippets related to this bug?

A: Yes, here are some code snippets related to this bug:

// noRootFolder rule if (dataExtension.isSynchronized) { // skip synchronized data extensions return; }


* ```javascript
// error message for noRootFolder rule
if (dataExtension.isSynchronized) {
  // error message indicating that synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder
  return "Error: Synchronized data extensions are not allowed in the root folder.";
}

Q: Can I see some commit messages related to this bug?

A: Yes, here are some commit messages related to this bug:

"Fix bug in noRootFolder rule to skip synchronized data extensions"
"Add option to skip synchronized data extensions in noRootFolder rule"
"Improve error messages for noRootFolder rule"