Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Coordination Function Of The Health Sector During The Emergency Response Period Of Mount Sinabung Eruption In 2014
Analysis of the Implementation of the Health Coordination Function in the Emergency Response of Mount Sinabung Eruption in 2014
Introduction
The Mount Sinabung eruption disaster that occurred in 2014 has left a lasting impact on the community, resulting in numerous fatalities, damage to public facilities, and the displacement of residents. The urgency of this situation necessitated a collaborative response from all sectors, including the health sector. Effective coordination is crucial in emergency situations to ensure that health services are provided efficiently, without duplication or overlap. This study aims to analyze the implementation of coordination functions in the health sector during the emergency response period due to the eruption of Mount Sinabung.
Background
The Mount Sinabung eruption disaster in 2014 was a significant event that highlighted the importance of effective coordination in the health sector. The disaster resulted in a massive influx of refugees, who required immediate medical attention and care. The health sector played a critical role in responding to this disaster, but the effectiveness of their response was hindered by coordination issues. This study seeks to examine the implementation of coordination functions in the health sector during this period, with a focus on vertical, horizontal, and diagonal coordination.
Methodology
This study employed a qualitative research method, using in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies to collect data. The informants involved in this study consisted of the Head of the Health Service, the Head of the Health Services, and the Head of the Brastagi Health Center. To ensure the validity of the data, this study also used triangulation techniques, both from information sources and data.
Results
The results of this study showed that in terms of vertical coordination, there were several shortcomings in the range of supervision and centralization and decentralization. Although the command in coordination has been going well, horizontal coordination carried out internally between scientific disciplines is good, there are still obstacles in terms of the absence of job description and SOP in the Matrix Department. Meanwhile, external coordination between related institutions is less effective.
Furthermore, diagonal coordination in disaster management is also found to be less than optimal. This can inhibit rapid and effective health responses in emergency situations. However, there are factors that support coordination, namely the sense of brotherhood or "aron" between refugees and health workers that allows health services to be done as well as possible at the refugee post.
Discussion
The findings of this study highlight the importance of effective coordination in the health sector during emergency situations. The shortcomings in vertical coordination, particularly in terms of supervision and centralization and decentralization, hindered the response to the disaster. The absence of job description and SOP in the Matrix Department also created obstacles in horizontal coordination. External coordination between related institutions was also found to be less effective.
The diagonal coordination in disaster management was also found to be less than optimal, which can inhibit rapid and effective health responses in emergency situations. However, the sense of brotherhood or "aron" between refugees and health workers played a crucial role in facilitating health services at the refugee post.
Conclusion
This study provides an overview of the implementation of coordination in the health sector during the emergency response period due to the eruption of Mount Sinabung. The findings highlight the importance of effective coordination in the health sector during emergency situations. The study also provides strategic input for improvement in the future disaster management system.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended for the Karo District Health Office to carry out comprehensive revitalization and reorganization related to their roles, duties, and functions in disaster management in the health sector. In addition, it is also important to strengthen cooperation with related agencies so that the disaster management system can be more integrated. For the newly formed Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD), it is recommended to prepare a clear SOP so as to facilitate the implementation of cross-sectoral coordination in the future, especially in dealing with the possibility of the recurrence of the eruption of Mount Sinabung.
Limitations
This study has several limitations. The study was conducted in a specific context, and the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. The study also relied on a qualitative research method, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the implementation of coordination functions in the health sector.
Future Research Directions
This study provides a foundation for future research on the implementation of coordination functions in the health sector during emergency situations. Future studies can build on this study by examining the effectiveness of coordination in other contexts, such as natural disasters or pandemics. Future studies can also explore the role of technology in facilitating coordination in the health sector during emergency situations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study provides an overview of the implementation of coordination in the health sector during the emergency response period due to the eruption of Mount Sinabung. The findings highlight the importance of effective coordination in the health sector during emergency situations. The study also provides strategic input for improvement in the future disaster management system.
Q&A: Analysis of the Implementation of the Health Coordination Function in the Emergency Response of Mount Sinabung Eruption in 2014
Q: What was the main objective of this study?
A: The main objective of this study was to analyze the implementation of coordination functions in the health sector during the emergency response period due to the eruption of Mount Sinabung.
Q: What was the research method used in this study?
A: The research method used in this study was qualitative, using in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies to collect data.
Q: Who were the informants involved in this study?
A: The informants involved in this study consisted of the Head of the Health Service, the Head of the Health Services, and the Head of the Brastagi Health Center.
Q: What were the findings of this study regarding vertical coordination?
A: The findings of this study showed that there were several shortcomings in the range of supervision and centralization and decentralization in vertical coordination.
Q: What were the findings of this study regarding horizontal coordination?
A: The findings of this study showed that horizontal coordination carried out internally between scientific disciplines was good, but there were still obstacles in terms of the absence of job description and SOP in the Matrix Department.
Q: What were the findings of this study regarding external coordination?
A: The findings of this study showed that external coordination between related institutions was less effective.
Q: What were the findings of this study regarding diagonal coordination?
A: The findings of this study showed that diagonal coordination in disaster management was less than optimal, which can inhibit rapid and effective health responses in emergency situations.
Q: What were the factors that supported coordination in this study?
A: The findings of this study showed that the sense of brotherhood or "aron" between refugees and health workers played a crucial role in facilitating health services at the refugee post.
Q: What are the recommendations of this study?
A: The recommendations of this study include carrying out comprehensive revitalization and reorganization related to roles, duties, and functions in disaster management in the health sector, strengthening cooperation with related agencies, and preparing a clear SOP for the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD).
Q: What are the limitations of this study?
A: The study has several limitations, including being conducted in a specific context and relying on a qualitative research method.
Q: What are the future research directions of this study?
A: The future research directions of this study include examining the effectiveness of coordination in other contexts, such as natural disasters or pandemics, and exploring the role of technology in facilitating coordination in the health sector during emergency situations.
Q: What are the implications of this study for disaster management in the health sector?
A: The implications of this study for disaster management in the health sector include the need for effective coordination, comprehensive revitalization and reorganization, and strengthening cooperation with related agencies.
Q: What are the implications of this study for policy makers and practitioners in the health sector?
A: The implications of this study for policy makers and practitioners in the health sector include the need to prioritize effective coordination, develop clear SOPs, and strengthen cooperation with related agencies to ensure effective disaster management in the health sector.