Analysis Of The Implementation Of Promotive And Preventive Services In The National Health Insurance Era At The Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City In 2016
Analysis of the Implementation of Promotive and Preventive Services in the National Health Insurance Era at the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in 2016
Introduction
In the National Health Insurance (JKN) era carried out by the Social Security Organizing Agency (BPJS) since 2014, promotive and preventive health efforts are very important. This is because the funds allocated for health services can be in vain if they are not accompanied by efforts to prevent and improve public health. The implementation of promotive and preventive services is crucial in achieving optimal health outcomes and reducing the burden on the healthcare system.
Background
The Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City is one of the health centers that have been implementing promotive and preventive services in the JKN era. This research aims to analyze the implementation of promotive and preventive services at the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in 2016. Through a qualitative approach and interviews with six informants, this study aims to identify the challenges and suggestions to improve the quality of promotive and preventive services.
Methodology
This study used a qualitative approach and conducted interviews with six informants, including the Health Promotion Staff of the Medan City Health Office, the Head of the Helvetia Health Center, the Medan City BPJS staff, the Head of the Helvetia Health Center Health Promotion, and two JKN participating patients. The data collected from the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
The results showed that the Helvetia Puskesmas had run promotive and preventive programs both before and after the application of JKN. Public health efforts carried out include dental and oral health counseling, education to pregnant women, counseling about balanced nutrition, mosquito control causes of dengue fever (DHF), as well as counseling to the elderly after monthly exercise. On the other hand, individual health efforts are also carried out through the home visit of TB patients, home visits for handling malnutrition, and counseling about non-communicable diseases.
Challenges and Suggestions to Improve the Quality of Promotive and Preventive Services
Although the promotive and preventive programs at the Helvetia Health Center have been running, this research also identifies several challenges that need to be overcome. The quality of health workers handling promotive and preventive services needs to be improved through more intensive training and education. This is important to increase the effectiveness of programs and achieve more optimal public health goals. In addition, it is necessary to increase the motivation and alertness of the Helvetia Health Center Health Center in providing promotive and preventive services. This can be done by giving appreciation of good performance and creating a conducive work environment to run the program with full dedication.
Conclusion
This study shows that the Helvetia Medan Health Center has run promotive and preventive programs in the JKN era. However, to improve the quality of service and achieve a higher health degree of public health, efforts need to be made to improve the quality of health workers and motivate them to be more active in running promotive and preventive programs. It is hoped that this research can be a reference for the Medan City Health Office and the Head of the Medan Helvetia Puskesmas to improve the quality of promotive and preventive services at the Helvetia Puskesmas.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:
- Improve the quality of health workers handling promotive and preventive services through more intensive training and education.
- Increase the motivation and alertness of the Helvetia Health Center Health Center in providing promotive and preventive services.
- Create a conducive work environment to run the program with full dedication.
- Give appreciation of good performance to health workers who are actively involved in promotive and preventive programs.
Limitations of the Study
This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study only focused on the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City and may not be generalizable to other health centers. Secondly, the study only used a qualitative approach and may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the implementation of promotive and preventive services.
Future Research Directions
Future research should focus on the implementation of promotive and preventive services in other health centers and explore the challenges and suggestions to improve the quality of service. Additionally, future research should use a mixed-methods approach to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implementation of promotive and preventive services.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study provides an analysis of the implementation of promotive and preventive services in the National Health Insurance era at the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in 2016. The study identifies several challenges that need to be overcome to improve the quality of service and achieve a higher health degree of public health. The recommendations made in this study are expected to be useful for the Medan City Health Office and the Head of the Medan Helvetia Puskesmas to improve the quality of promotive and preventive services at the Helvetia Puskesmas.
Q&A: Analysis of the Implementation of Promotive and Preventive Services in the National Health Insurance Era at the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in 2016
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the main objective of this study?
A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the implementation of promotive and preventive services in the National Health Insurance era at the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in 2016.
Q: What are promotive and preventive services?
A: Promotive and preventive services are health services that aim to prevent and promote health, rather than treating diseases. These services include health education, health promotion, and disease prevention.
Q: What are the challenges faced by the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in implementing promotive and preventive services?
A: The challenges faced by the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City in implementing promotive and preventive services include the need for more intensive training and education for health workers, increasing the motivation and alertness of health workers, and creating a conducive work environment.
Q: What are the recommendations made by this study to improve the quality of promotive and preventive services?
A: The recommendations made by this study include improving the quality of health workers handling promotive and preventive services, increasing the motivation and alertness of health workers, creating a conducive work environment, and giving appreciation of good performance to health workers who are actively involved in promotive and preventive programs.
Q: What are the limitations of this study?
A: The limitations of this study include the fact that it only focused on the Helvetia Puskesmas Medan City and may not be generalizable to other health centers, and the study only used a qualitative approach and may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the implementation of promotive and preventive services.
Q: What are the future research directions suggested by this study?
A: The future research directions suggested by this study include exploring the implementation of promotive and preventive services in other health centers, using a mixed-methods approach to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implementation of promotive and preventive services, and examining the effectiveness of promotive and preventive services in improving public health outcomes.
Q: What are the implications of this study for policy and practice?
A: The implications of this study for policy and practice include the need for policy makers and health administrators to prioritize the implementation of promotive and preventive services, provide adequate resources and support for health workers, and create a conducive work environment to promote the delivery of high-quality promotive and preventive services.
Q: What are the potential benefits of implementing promotive and preventive services?
A: The potential benefits of implementing promotive and preventive services include improved public health outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and increased patient satisfaction.
Additional Questions and Answers
Q: What is the role of health education in promotive and preventive services?
A: Health education plays a crucial role in promotive and preventive services by empowering individuals and communities to take control of their health and make informed decisions about their health.
Q: How can health workers be motivated to deliver high-quality promotive and preventive services?
A: Health workers can be motivated to deliver high-quality promotive and preventive services by providing them with adequate training and education, recognizing and rewarding their achievements, and creating a conducive work environment.
Q: What are the key indicators of the effectiveness of promotive and preventive services?
A: The key indicators of the effectiveness of promotive and preventive services include improved health outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, and reduced healthcare costs.
Q: How can the implementation of promotive and preventive services be evaluated?
A: The implementation of promotive and preventive services can be evaluated using a variety of methods, including surveys, focus groups, and program evaluation studies.