Analysis Of Project Acceleration Using Crashing Methods With Workers And Work Shift

Feb 27, 2025 by ADMIN 84 views

**Project Acceleration Analysis Using Crashing Methods With Workers and Work Shift**

Introduction

Project implementation often experiences delays caused by various factors such as unexpected weather, location that is difficult to reach, errors in design, and discrepancy of plans. Delays in project implementation can have significant consequences, including increased costs, reduced productivity, and damage to the reputation of the project manager and the organization. To overcome this delay problem, one solution that can be applied is to speed up the project completion process. The method that is often used for this acceleration is the crashing method, which can be done through increasing the number of labor and more effective work shift arrangements.

Background of the Study

This research is focused on the Lau Simme Dam construction project located on Jl. Blue-Blue, Deli Serdang, North Sumatra. The purpose of this study is to avoid delays in project implementation by analyzing the acceleration using the crashing method, both through the addition of labor and the addition of work shifts. The crashing method is a technique used to accelerate project completion by increasing the number of resources or working hours. This method can be applied in various ways, including increasing the number of labor, adding work shifts, or using overtime.

Methodology

The analysis results show that if using the addition of labor, the total wage costs required are Rp. 176,875,531.83. Whereas with the addition of work shifts, the total cost that must be incurred reaches Rp. 328,573,470,33. For comparison, the total normal wage before the addition is Rp. 152,824,869.92, with a normal duration of project implementation for 232 days. The addition of labor and work shifts can significantly impact the project duration and cost. By analyzing the results, we can see that the addition of work shifts is more effective in accelerating the project completion process.

Results

After the addition of labor, the project duration can be accelerated to 203 days, which means there is an acceleration of 12.5% of the normal duration. On the other hand, by applying the addition of work shifts, the duration of the project can be cut up to 112 days, or around 51.7% faster than the normal duration. The results of the study show that the addition of work shifts is more effective in accelerating the project completion process. This is caused by the ability to add work shifts to accelerate the duration of work significantly, which in turn can improve the overall project performance.

Discussion

Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the addition of work shifts is more effective in applying the crashing method. The addition of work shifts can provide significant benefits, including improved productivity, reduced costs, and accelerated project completion. This is because the addition of work shifts can allow for more efficient use of resources, reduce the need for overtime, and improve the overall project performance.

Conclusion

From the analysis above, we can see that careful planning and the application of the right method are very important in managing the project to remain in accordance with the specified time. Integrating the crashing method with the addition of labor and work shifts not only helps reduce project completion time, but also provides opportunities to increase labor productivity and cost efficiency. Therefore, for project managers, it is important to consider these two options carefully so that the final results of the project can meet the expectations and needs of stakeholders.

Recommendations

Based on the results of the study, the following recommendations can be made:

Project managers should consider the addition of work shifts as a viable option for accelerating project completion.
The addition of labor should be used in conjunction with the addition of work shifts to achieve optimal results.
Careful planning and analysis are essential in managing the project to remain in accordance with the specified time.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study was conducted on a single project, and the results may not be generalizable to other projects.
The study only considered the addition of labor and work shifts as options for accelerating project completion.
The study did not consider other factors that may impact project completion, such as changes in project scope or unexpected delays.

Future Research Directions

Future research should consider the following directions:

Conducting a study on multiple projects to generalize the results.
Considering other options for accelerating project completion, such as the use of technology or outsourcing.
Analyzing the impact of changes in project scope or unexpected delays on project completion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has shown that the addition of work shifts is more effective in accelerating project completion than the addition of labor. The results of the study have significant implications for project managers, who should consider the addition of work shifts as a viable option for accelerating project completion. By integrating the crashing method with the addition of labor and work shifts, project managers can achieve optimal results and meet the expectations and needs of stakeholders.

Q: What is the crashing method, and how does it relate to project acceleration?

A: The crashing method is a technique used to accelerate project completion by increasing the number of resources or working hours. This method can be applied in various ways, including increasing the number of labor, adding work shifts, or using overtime.

Q: What are the benefits of using the crashing method in project acceleration?

A: The benefits of using the crashing method in project acceleration include improved productivity, reduced costs, and accelerated project completion. By integrating the crashing method with the addition of labor and work shifts, project managers can achieve optimal results and meet the expectations and needs of stakeholders.

Q: How does the addition of labor impact project duration and cost?

A: The addition of labor can significantly impact the project duration and cost. By analyzing the results, we can see that the addition of labor can accelerate the project completion process, but it may also increase the total wage costs required.

Q: How does the addition of work shifts impact project duration and cost?

A: The addition of work shifts can significantly impact the project duration and cost. By analyzing the results, we can see that the addition of work shifts is more effective in accelerating the project completion process, and it may also reduce the total cost that must be incurred.

Q: What are the limitations of the study, and how can they be addressed in future research?

A: The study has several limitations, including the fact that it was conducted on a single project, and the results may not be generalizable to other projects. Future research should consider conducting a study on multiple projects to generalize the results.

Q: What are the recommendations for project managers based on the results of the study?

A: Based on the results of the study, the following recommendations can be made:

Project managers should consider the addition of work shifts as a viable option for accelerating project completion.
The addition of labor should be used in conjunction with the addition of work shifts to achieve optimal results.
Careful planning and analysis are essential in managing the project to remain in accordance with the specified time.

Q: What are the future research directions based on the results of the study?

A: Future research should consider the following directions:

Conducting a study on multiple projects to generalize the results.
Considering other options for accelerating project completion, such as the use of technology or outsourcing.
Analyzing the impact of changes in project scope or unexpected delays on project completion.

Q: What are the implications of the study for project managers and stakeholders?

A: The results of the study have significant implications for project managers and stakeholders. By integrating the crashing method with the addition of labor and work shifts, project managers can achieve optimal results and meet the expectations and needs of stakeholders.

Q: What are the key takeaways from the study?

A: The key takeaways from the study are:

The addition of work shifts is more effective in accelerating project completion than the addition of labor.
Careful planning and analysis are essential in managing the project to remain in accordance with the specified time.
Integrating the crashing method with the addition of labor and work shifts can provide significant benefits, including improved productivity, reduced costs, and accelerated project completion.