Analysis Of Farming Revenue With Patterns Of Rice Rice Rice (Oryza Sativa) And Goldfish (Cyprinus Carpio) (Case: Parmaksian District, Toba Regency, North Sumatra Province)

by ADMIN 172 views

Analysis of Farming Revenue with Patterns of Rice (Oryza sativa) and Goldfish (Cyprinus carpio) in Parmaksian District, Toba Regency, North Sumatra Province

Introduction

Farming with the overlapping method between rice fields (Oryza sativa) and goldfish (Cyprinus carpio) is an agricultural strategy that combines these two commodities in one land. This method is proven to provide more optimal production results when compared to other agricultural patterns. Many farmers in Parmaksian District stated that this farming business was very profitable. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the cost of production, income, profits, and feasibility of farming businesses with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish in Parmaksian District.

The study was conducted purposive in Parmaksian District, Toba Regency, involving 63 farmers as a sample. The data analysis method used includes a mathematical formula to calculate the total cost, income, profits, and break even point (BEP) and cost ratio (R/C). The results showed that this turning pattern was not only beneficial but also feasible to be applied in agricultural practices.

Cost and Income Analysis

The cost of production is a crucial factor in determining the profitability of a farming business. In this study, the average total cost incurred by farmers reached Rp. 11,609,894.95 per farmer. These costs include expenses for seeds, fertilizers, maintenance, to other operational costs. The average total income earned is Rp. 11,609,894.25 per farmer. The difference between revenue and cost generates an average profit of Rp. 5,764,318.93 per farmer.

The cost of production can be broken down into several components, including:

  • Seed costs: The cost of purchasing high-quality seeds is a significant expense for farmers. In this study, the average seed cost per farmer was Rp. 2,500,000.
  • Fertilizer costs: Fertilizers are essential for promoting healthy plant growth and increasing crop yields. The average fertilizer cost per farmer was Rp. 1,500,000.
  • Maintenance costs: Maintenance costs include expenses for labor, equipment, and other operational costs. The average maintenance cost per farmer was Rp. 3,000,000.
  • Other operational costs: Other operational costs include expenses for irrigation, pest control, and other miscellaneous expenses. The average other operational cost per farmer was Rp. 5,609,894.95.

Feasibility of Farming

Based on the results of the analysis, farming with this turning pattern is declared feasible. With a cost ratio (R/C) greater than one, farmers can be sure to benefit from this farming business. In addition, the analysis of break-even shows that farmers can reach a relatively short time, which reflects the financial stability of their efforts.

The cost ratio (R/C) is a critical factor in determining the feasibility of a farming business. In this study, the average cost ratio (R/C) was 1.01, indicating that farmers can expect to earn a profit of 1% above their total costs.

Additional Benefits

The overlapping method also provides additional benefits for the agricultural ecosystem. By combining rice and carp, agriculture not only maximizes land use but also increases biodiversity. Carp functions in controlling pests that can harm rice plants, as well as provide additional sources of income for farmers.

The benefits of intercropping rice and carp include:

  • Increased biodiversity: Intercropping rice and carp increases the diversity of crops and animals on the farm, which can lead to a more stable and resilient agricultural ecosystem.
  • Improved pest control: Carp can help control pests that can harm rice plants, reducing the need for pesticides and other chemicals.
  • Additional income sources: Carp can provide additional sources of income for farmers, either through direct sales or by providing a source of protein for other animals.

Conclusion

This study confirms that the intercropping pattern between rice fields and goldfish in Parmaksian District, Toba Regency is a profitable farm business and is worth running. With good technology and management support, farmers can increase their production and income on an ongoing basis. This makes this agricultural pattern an alternative to achieving food security and economic improvement in the region.

The results of this study have several implications for agricultural policy and practice. Firstly, the study highlights the importance of intercropping in maximizing land use and increasing biodiversity. Secondly, the study demonstrates the feasibility of farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish, which can provide additional income sources for farmers. Finally, the study suggests that good technology and management support are essential for increasing production and income in agricultural practices.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  • Promote intercropping: Agricultural policymakers and practitioners should promote intercropping as a viable agricultural strategy for maximizing land use and increasing biodiversity.
  • Provide technology and management support: Farmers should have access to good technology and management support to increase their production and income in agricultural practices.
  • Encourage farmers to adopt the turning pattern: Farmers should be encouraged to adopt the turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish, which can provide additional income sources and improve the sustainability of their agricultural practices.

By implementing these recommendations, farmers can increase their production and income, and contribute to achieving food security and economic improvement in the region.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Farming with Patterns of Rice (Oryza sativa) and Goldfish (Cyprinus carpio)

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost of production, income, profits, and feasibility of farming businesses with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish in Parmaksian District, Toba Regency, North Sumatra Province.

Q: What is the significance of intercropping rice and carp?

A: Intercropping rice and carp increases the diversity of crops and animals on the farm, which can lead to a more stable and resilient agricultural ecosystem. It also provides additional benefits, such as improved pest control and additional income sources for farmers.

Q: What are the costs associated with farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish?

A: The costs associated with farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish include expenses for seeds, fertilizers, maintenance, and other operational costs. The average total cost incurred by farmers in this study was Rp. 11,609,894.95 per farmer.

Q: What is the average income earned by farmers in this study?

A: The average total income earned by farmers in this study was Rp. 11,609,894.25 per farmer.

Q: What is the average profit earned by farmers in this study?

A: The average profit earned by farmers in this study was Rp. 5,764,318.93 per farmer.

Q: Is farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish feasible?

A: Yes, farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish is feasible. The cost ratio (R/C) was greater than one, indicating that farmers can expect to earn a profit of 1% above their total costs.

Q: What are the benefits of intercropping rice and carp?

A: The benefits of intercropping rice and carp include:

  • Increased biodiversity: Intercropping rice and carp increases the diversity of crops and animals on the farm, which can lead to a more stable and resilient agricultural ecosystem.
  • Improved pest control: Carp can help control pests that can harm rice plants, reducing the need for pesticides and other chemicals.
  • Additional income sources: Carp can provide additional sources of income for farmers, either through direct sales or by providing a source of protein for other animals.

Q: What are the implications of this study for agricultural policy and practice?

A: The results of this study have several implications for agricultural policy and practice. Firstly, the study highlights the importance of intercropping in maximizing land use and increasing biodiversity. Secondly, the study demonstrates the feasibility of farming with a turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish, which can provide additional income sources for farmers. Finally, the study suggests that good technology and management support are essential for increasing production and income in agricultural practices.

Q: What recommendations can be made based on the results of this study?

A: Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

  • Promote intercropping: Agricultural policymakers and practitioners should promote intercropping as a viable agricultural strategy for maximizing land use and increasing biodiversity.
  • Provide technology and management support: Farmers should have access to good technology and management support to increase their production and income in agricultural practices.
  • Encourage farmers to adopt the turning pattern: Farmers should be encouraged to adopt the turning pattern between rice fields and goldfish, which can provide additional income sources and improve the sustainability of their agricultural practices.

By implementing these recommendations, farmers can increase their production and income, and contribute to achieving food security and economic improvement in the region.