Actors And 2014 Elections In Medan City (Study Of Forms Of Mutual Support Of Social Organizations With Candidates For Medan City DPRD Members In The 2014 Legislative Election)

by ADMIN 176 views

Actors and 2014 Elections in Medan City: The Study of Mutually Beneficial Support of Social Organizations with Prospective Members of the Medan City DPRD

Introduction

The 2014 Legislative Election in Medan City is a significant event that highlights the consolidation of democracy at the local level. However, this process is hindered by a transactional form that exists between legislative candidates and social organizations in the city. This research aims to analyze the form of mutual support between social organizations and candidates for Medan City DPRD members in Electoral District 2 in the 2014 Legislative Election.

Background

Medan City is a hub of social and political activities, with various social organizations playing a crucial role in shaping the city's politics. Two well-known social organizations, Pemuda Pancasila and the Karya Youth Association, are particularly active in election activities. Their activeness is a significant source of votes that can be achieved by candidates for DPRD members who participate in the 2014 elections.

Theoretical Framework

This study uses the theory of local bossism by John T. Sidel to analyze the behavior of community organizational groups in Medan in providing support to candidates for DPRD members from the 2014 Election. In addition, the concept of local strongmen by Joel Migdal is used to analyze individuals or groups who have a strong influence in an area. The theory of local bossism suggests that local leaders or organizations play a crucial role in shaping the politics of a region, while the concept of local strongmen highlights the importance of individuals or groups who have a significant influence in a particular area.

Methodology

This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive data analysis techniques. Data collection is carried out through interview methods and literature studies. The research focuses on the 2014 Legislative Election in Medan City, specifically in Electoral District 2.

Findings

The findings of this study show that the community in Medan City is compartmentalized by social organizations. The existence of a large and scattered number of members throughout Medan is used by legislative candidates to increase votes. Coupled with the absence of regulations that limit the participation of non-democratic community groups, including the behavior of political parties and interest groups.

A form of mutual support between legislative candidates from the electoral district of 2 Medan and social organizations in the 2014 elections is carried out through transactions or use of money to get votes. This shows the existence of transactional political practices that reduce the essence of democracy and triggers serious questions about the quality of political representation in the city of Medan.

Discussion

The existence of social organizations with a large number of members and spread in the city of Medan is a potential that can be utilized by legislative candidates to win votes. However, this also opens opportunities for transactional political practices that are detrimental to democracy. The absence of regulations that limit the participation of non-democratic community groups is one of the factors that facilitate this transactional practice.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of understanding the role of social organizations in shaping the politics of Medan City. The findings of this research suggest that the existence of social organizations with a large number of members and spread in the city is a potential that can be utilized by legislative candidates to win votes. However, this also opens opportunities for transactional political practices that are detrimental to democracy.

Recommendations

Efforts are needed to minimize transactional political practices and build a more just and democratic political system. This can be achieved by implementing regulations that limit the participation of non-democratic community groups and promoting a culture of transparency and accountability in politics.

Limitations

This research only focuses on one electoral district in the city of Medan. However, this finding can be a reflection material for strengthening democracy at the local level. Future research can build on this study by exploring other electoral districts in Medan City and examining the role of social organizations in shaping the politics of other cities in Indonesia.

Future Research Directions

Future research can explore the following directions:

  • Examining the role of social organizations in shaping the politics of other cities in Indonesia
  • Investigating the impact of transactional political practices on democracy in Medan City
  • Analyzing the effectiveness of regulations in limiting the participation of non-democratic community groups
  • Exploring the role of local strongmen in shaping the politics of Medan City

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of understanding the role of social organizations in shaping the politics of Medan City. The findings of this research suggest that the existence of social organizations with a large number of members and spread in the city is a potential that can be utilized by legislative candidates to win votes. However, this also opens opportunities for transactional political practices that are detrimental to democracy. Efforts are needed to minimize transactional political practices and build a more just and democratic political system.
Actors and 2014 Elections in Medan City: The Study of Mutually Beneficial Support of Social Organizations with Prospective Members of the Medan City DPRD

Q&A

Q: What is the main focus of this study?

A: The main focus of this study is to analyze the form of mutual support between social organizations and candidates for Medan City DPRD members in Electoral District 2 in the 2014 Legislative Election.

Q: What is the significance of the 2014 Legislative Election in Medan City?

A: The 2014 Legislative Election in Medan City is significant because it highlights the consolidation of democracy at the local level. However, this process is hindered by a transactional form that exists between legislative candidates and social organizations in the city.

Q: What are the two well-known social organizations in Medan City that are particularly active in election activities?

A: The two well-known social organizations in Medan City that are particularly active in election activities are Pemuda Pancasila and the Karya Youth Association.

Q: What is the theory of local bossism and how is it used in this study?

A: The theory of local bossism suggests that local leaders or organizations play a crucial role in shaping the politics of a region. This theory is used in this study to analyze the behavior of community organizational groups in Medan in providing support to candidates for DPRD members from the 2014 Election.

Q: What is the concept of local strongmen and how is it used in this study?

A: The concept of local strongmen highlights the importance of individuals or groups who have a significant influence in a particular area. This concept is used in this study to analyze individuals or groups who have a strong influence in Medan City.

Q: What is the research methodology used in this study?

A: The research methodology used in this study is qualitative with descriptive data analysis techniques. Data collection is carried out through interview methods and literature studies.

Q: What are the findings of this study?

A: The findings of this study show that the community in Medan City is compartmentalized by social organizations. The existence of a large and scattered number of members throughout Medan is used by legislative candidates to increase votes. Coupled with the absence of regulations that limit the participation of non-democratic community groups, including the behavior of political parties and interest groups.

Q: What is the form of mutual support between legislative candidates and social organizations in the 2014 elections?

A: The form of mutual support between legislative candidates and social organizations in the 2014 elections is carried out through transactions or use of money to get votes.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The implications of this study suggest that the existence of social organizations with a large number of members and spread in the city is a potential that can be utilized by legislative candidates to win votes. However, this also opens opportunities for transactional political practices that are detrimental to democracy.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study suggest that efforts are needed to minimize transactional political practices and build a more just and democratic political system. This can be achieved by implementing regulations that limit the participation of non-democratic community groups and promoting a culture of transparency and accountability in politics.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are that it only focuses on one electoral district in the city of Medan. However, this finding can be a reflection material for strengthening democracy at the local level.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research can explore the following directions:

  • Examining the role of social organizations in shaping the politics of other cities in Indonesia
  • Investigating the impact of transactional political practices on democracy in Medan City
  • Analyzing the effectiveness of regulations in limiting the participation of non-democratic community groups
  • Exploring the role of local strongmen in shaping the politics of Medan City